The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure and function of natural and synthetic signalling molecules in parasitic weed germination
Abstract
The structures of naturally occurring germination stimulants for seeds of the parasitic weeds Striga spp. and Orobanche spp. are described. The bioactiphore in this strigolactone family of stimulants is deduced from a structure–activity relationship and shown to reside in the CD part of the stimulant molecule. A molecular mechanism for the initial stages of seed germination is proposed. The influence of stereochemistry on the stimulant activity is significant. Combining this molecular information leads to a model for the design of synthetic strigolactones. Nijmegen‐1 is a typical example of a highly active, newly designed synthetic stimulant. The occurrence of natural stimulants not belonging to the strigolactone family, such as cotylenin and parthenolide, is briefly described. The biosynthesis of natural strigolactones from β‐carotene is analysed in terms of isolated and predicted stimulants. This scheme will be helpful in the search for new strigolactones from root exudates. Protein fishing experiments to isolate and characterise the receptor protein using biotin‐labelled GR 24 are described. A receptor protein of 60 kD was identified by this method. Nijmegen‐1 has been tested as a suicidal germination agent in field trials on tobacco infested by Orobanche ramosa L. The preliminary results are highly rewarding. Finally, some future challenges in synthesis are described. These include synthesising new natural and synthetic stimulants and establishing the molecular connection between strigolactones as germination stimulants, as the branching factor for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and as an inhibitor of shoot branching. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Akiyama, K., Matsuzaki, K.-I., & Hayashi, H. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03608 · Cited by 2,429
Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching
Gomez-Roldan, V., Fermas, S., Brewer, P. B., Puech-Pagès, V., Dun, E. A., Pillot, J.-P., Letisse, F., Matusova, R., Danoun, S., Portais, J.-C., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07271 · Cited by 2,281
Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones
Umehara, M., Hanada, A., Yoshida, S., Akiyama, K., Arite, T., Takeda-Kamiya, N., Magome, H., Kamiya, Y., Shirasu, K., Yoneyama, K., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07272 · Cited by 2,105
Rhizosphere communication of plants, parasitic plants and AM fungi
Bouwmeester, H. J., Roux, C., Lopez-Raez, J. A., & Bécard, G. (2007) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2007.03.009 · Cited by 486
Yoneyama, K., Xie, X., Kusumoto, D., Sekimoto, H., Sugimoto, Y., Takeuchi, Y., & Yoneyama, K. (2007) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-007-0600-5 · Cited by 426
Cited by
Hamiaux, C., Drummond, R. S. M., Janssen, B. J., Ledger, S. E., Cooney, J. M., Newcomb, R. D., & Snowden, K. C. (2012) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.007 · Cited by 623
In Posidonia oceanica cadmium induces changes in DNA methylation and chromatin patterning
Greco, M., Chiappetta, A., Bruno, L., & Bitonti, M. B. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err313 · Cited by 538
Strigolactones and the control of plant development: lessons from shoot branching
Waldie, T., McCulloch, H., & Leyser, O. (2014) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12488 · Cited by 242
Structures of D 14 and D 14 L in the strigolactone and karrikin signaling pathways
Kagiyama, M., Hirano, Y., Mori, T., Kim, S., Kyozuka, J., Seto, Y., Yamaguchi, S., & Hakoshima, T. (2013) · Genes to Cells · doi:10.1111/gtc.12025 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Zwanenburg, B., Mwakaboko, A. S., Reizelman, A., Anilkumar, G., & Sethumadhavan, D.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02-16
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 478-491
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2023068022
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 25.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.