The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ingested RNA interference for managing the populations of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata
Abstract
BACKGROUND: RNA interference (RNAi) is a breakthrough technology for conducting functional genomics studies and also as a potential tool for crop protection against insect pests. The major challenge for efficient pest control using RNAi in the field is the development of efficient and reliable methods for production and delivery of double‐stranded RNA (dsRNA). In this paper, the potential of feeding dsRNA expressed in bacteria or synthesized in vitro to manage populations of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (CPB), was investigated. RESULTS: Feeding RNAi successfully triggered the silencing of all five target genes tested and caused significant mortality and reduced body weight gain in the treated beetles. This study provides the first example of an effective RNAi response in insects after feeding dsRNA produced in bacteria. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the efficient induction of RNAi using bacteria to deliver dsRNA is a possible method for management of CPB. This could be also a promising bioassay approach for genome‐wide screens to identify effective target genes for use as novel RNAi‐based insecticides. Copyright © 2010 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001) · Methods · doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 · Cited by 180,860
Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E., & Mello, C. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35888 · Cited by 15,429
Mao, Y.-B., Cai, W.-J., Wang, J.-W., Hong, G.-J., Tao, X.-Y., Wang, L.-J., Huang, Y.-P., & Chen, X.-Y. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1352 · Cited by 1,358
Cited by
Mechanisms, Applications, and Challenges of Insect RNA Interference
Zhu, K. Y., & Palli, S. R. (2020) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025224 · Cited by 709
Self-citationJoga, M. R., Zotti, M. J., Smagghe, G., & Christiaens, O. (2016) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00553 · Cited by 521
Full crop protection from an insect pest by expression of long double-stranded RNAs in plastids
Zhang, J., Khan, S. A., Hasse, C., Ruf, S., Heckel, D. G., & Bock, R. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1261680 · Cited by 471
RNA interference technology in crop protection against arthropod pests, pathogens and nematodes
Zotti, M., dos Santos, E. A., Cagliari, D., Christiaens, O., Taning, C. N. T., & Smagghe, G. (2018) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4813 · Cited by 465
Next-generation insect-resistant plants: RNAi-mediated crop protection
Zhang, J., Khan, S. A., Heckel, D. G., & Bock, R. (2017) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.04.009 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, F., Xu, J., Palli, R., Ferguson, J., & Palli, S. R.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11-08
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-182
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2128412621
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
