The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides: current understanding
Abstract
Acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) inhibitor herbicides currently comprise the largest site‐of‐action group (with 54 active ingredients across five chemical groups) and have been widely used in world agriculture since they were first introduced in 1982. Resistance evolution in weeds to AHAS inhibitors has been rapid and identified in populations of many weed species. Often, evolved resistance is associated with point mutations in the target AHAS gene; however non‐target‐site enhanced herbicide metabolism occurs as well. Many AHAS gene resistance mutations can occur and be rapidly enriched owing to a high initial resistance gene frequency, simple and dominant genetic inheritance and lack of major fitness cost of the resistance alleles. Major advances in the elucidation of the crystal structure of the AHAS (Arabidopsis thaliana) catalytic subunit in complex with various AHAS inhibitor herbicides have greatly improved current understanding of the detailed molecular interactions between AHAS, cofactors and herbicides. Compared with target‐site resistance, non‐target‐site resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides is less studied and hence less understood. In a few well‐studied cases, non‐target‐site resistance is due to enhanced rates of herbicide metabolism (metabolic resistance), mimicking that occurring in tolerant crop species and often involving cytochrome P450 monooxygenases. However, the specific herbicide‐metabolising, resistance‐endowing genes are yet to be identified in resistant weed species. The current state of mechanistic understanding of AHAS inhibitor herbicide resistance is reviewed, and outstanding research issues are outlined. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds
Heap, I. (1997) · Cited by 3,066
Evolution in Action: Plants Resistant to Herbicides
Powles, S. B., & Yu, Q. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112119 · Cited by 1,714
Self-citationStomatal Size in Fossil Plants: Evidence for Polyploidy in Majority of Angiosperms
Masterson, J. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.264.5157.421 · Cited by 1,176
Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry
Powles, S. B., & Holtum, J. A. M. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 680
Self-citationWeb-based primer design for single nucleotide polymorphism analysis
Neff, M. M., Turk, E., & Kalishman, M. (2002) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(02)02820-2 · Cited by 572
Délye, C. (2013) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.3318 · Cited by 475
Herbicide cross resistance in weeds
Beckie, H. J., & Tardif, F. J. (2012) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2011.12.018 · Cited by 465
Herbicide-binding sites revealed in the structure of plant acetohydroxyacid synthase
McCourt, J. A., Pang, S. S., King-Scott, J., Guddat, L. W., & Duggleby, R. G. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0508701103 · Cited by 379
Fitness costs associated with evolved herbicide resistance alleles in plants
Vila‐Aiub, M. M., Neve, P., & Powles, S. B. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03055.x · Cited by 352
Self-citationNeve, P., & Powles, S. (2005) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-005-1947-2 · Cited by 234
Self-citationAHAS herbicide resistance endowing mutations: effect on AHAS functionality and plant growth
Yu, Q., Han, H., Vila-Aiub, M. M., & Powles, S. B. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq205 · Cited by 230
Self-citationCrystal structure of yeast acetohydroxyacid synthase: a target for herbicidal inhibitors
Pang, S. S., Duggleby, R. G., & Guddat, L. W. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.5419 · Cited by 203
Molecular Basis of Sulfonylurea Herbicide Inhibition of Acetohydroxyacid Synthase
Pang, S. S., Guddat, L. W., & Duggleby, R. G. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m211648200 · Cited by 172
Basis for Herbicide Resistance in Canadian Populations of Wild Oat ( Avena fatua )
Beckie, H. J., Warwick, S. I., & Sauder, C. A. (2012) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/ws-d-11-00110.1 · Cited by 121
Tardif, F. J., Rajčan, I., & Costea, M. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01596.x · Cited by 117
Yun, M., Yogo, Y., Miura, R., Yamasue, Y., & Fischer, A. J. (2005) · Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.pestbp.2005.04.002 · Cited by 114
Petit, C., Duhieu, B., Boucansaud, K., & Délye, C. (2010) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.03.007 · Cited by 112
Corbett, C.-A. L., & Tardif, F. J. (2006) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.1219 · Cited by 110
Han, H., Yu, Q. P., Purba, E., Li, M., Walsh, M., Friesen, S., & Powles, S. B. (2012) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.3278 · Cited by 104
Self-citationUchino, A., Ogata, S., Kohara, H., Yoshida, S., Yoshioka, T., & Watanabe, H. (2007) · Weed Biology and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1445-6664.2007.00240.x · Cited by 83
Délye, C., Pernin, F., & Scarabel, L. (2010) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.10.007 · Cited by 81
Intragenic recombination in the CSR1 locus of Arabidopsis
Mourad, G. S., Haughn, G. W., & King, J. (1994) · Molecular and General Genetics MGG · doi:10.1007/bf00280315 · Cited by 35
Harms, C. T., & DiMaio, J. J. (1991) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0176-1617(11)80691-7 · Cited by 25
Roux, F., Camilleri, C., Giancola, S., Brunel, D., & Reboud, X. (2005) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.105.043224 · Cited by 14
Woodward, I., & Slater, H. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01616.x · Cited by 8
Cited by
The evolutionary origins of pesticide resistance
Hawkins, N. J., Bass, C., Dixon, A., & Neve, P. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12440 · Cited by 836
Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion
Shimatani, Z., Kashojiya, S., Takayama, M., Terada, R., Arazoe, T., Ishii, H., Teramura, H., Yamamoto, T., Komatsu, H., Miura, K., et al. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3833 · Cited by 812
Svitashev, S., Young, J. K., Schwartz, C., Gao, H., Falco, S. C., & Cigan, A. M. (2015) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.15.00793 · Cited by 733
Generation of herbicide tolerance traits and a new selectable marker in wheat using base editing
Zhang, R., Liu, J., Chai, Z., Chen, S., Bai, Y., Zong, Y., Chen, K., Li, J., Jiang, L., & Gao, C. (2019) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-019-0405-0 · Cited by 334
Engineering herbicide-resistant watermelon variety through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated base-editing
Tian, S., Jiang, L., Cui, X., Zhang, J., Guo, S., Li, M., Zhang, H., Ren, Y., Gong, G., Zong, M., et al. (2018) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-018-2299-0 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, Q., & Powles, S. B.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-01-20
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1340-1350
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W1985819727
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 17.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
