The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glyphosate resistance: state of knowledge
Open accessAbstract
Studies of mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate have increased current understanding of herbicide resistance mechanisms. Thus far, single‐codon non‐synonymous mutations of EPSPS (5‐enolypyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase) have been rare and, relative to other herbicide mode of action target‐site mutations, unconventionally weak in magnitude for resistance to glyphosate. However, it is possible that weeds will emerge with non‐synonymous mutations of two codons of EPSPS to produce an enzyme endowing greater resistance to glyphosate. Today, target‐gene duplication is a common glyphosate resistance mechanism and could become a fundamental process for developing any resistance trait. Based on competition and substrate selectivity studies in several species, rapid vacuole sequestration of glyphosate occurs via a transporter mechanism. Conversely, as the chloroplast requires transporters for uptake of important metabolites, transporters associated with the two plastid membranes may separately, or together, successfully block glyphosate delivery. A model based on finite glyphosate dose and limiting time required for chloroplast loading sets the stage for understanding how uniquely different mechanisms can contribute to overall glyphosate resistance. © 2014 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metabolism and degradation of glyphosate in soil and water
Rueppel, M. L., Brightwell, B. B., Schaefer, J., & Marvel, J. T. (1977) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf60211a018 · Cited by 456
Cited by
Overview of glyphosate‐resistant weeds worldwide
Heap, I., & Duke, S. O. (2018) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4760 · Cited by 518
Schütte, G., Eckerstorfer, M., Rastelli, V., Reichenbecher, W., Restrepo-Vassalli, S., Ruohonen-Lehto, M., Saucy, A.-G. W., & Mertens, M. (2017) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-016-0100-y · Cited by 249
Improved plant cytosine base editors with high editing activity, purity, and specificity
Ren, Q., Sretenovic, S., Liu, G., Zhong, Z., Wang, J., Huang, L., Tang, X., Guo, Y., Liu, L., Wu, Y., et al. (2021) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13635 · Cited by 131
“The Y130F mutation was previously proposed to impact the deaminase-single strand DNA (ssDNA) interaction (Shi et al., 2017).”
BackgroundHow well will stacked transgenic pest/herbicide resistances delay pests from evolving resistance?
Gressel, J., Gassmann, A. J., & Owen, M. D. (2017) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4425 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Sammons, R. D., & Gaines, T. A.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-03-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1367-1377
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2079108727
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 49.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.