The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overview of glyphosate‐resistant weeds worldwide
Abstract
Glyphosate is the most widely used and successful herbicide discovered to date, but its utility is now threatened by the occurrence of several glyphosate‐resistant weed species. Glyphosate resistance first appeared in Lolium rigidum in an apple orchard in Australia in 1996, ironically the year that the first glyphosate‐resistant crop (soybean) was introduced in the USA. Thirty‐eight weed species have now evolved resistance to glyphosate, distributed across 37 countries and in 34 different crops and six non‐crop situations. Although glyphosate‐resistant weeds have been identified in orchards, vineyards, plantations, cereals, fallow and non‐crop situations, it is the glyphosate‐resistant weeds in glyphosate‐resistant crop systems that dominate the area infested and growing economic impact. Glyphosate‐resistant weeds present the greatest threat to sustained weed control in major agronomic crops because this herbicide is used to control weeds with resistance to herbicides with other sites of action, and no new herbicide sites of action have been introduced for over 30 years. Industry has responded by developing herbicide resistance traits in major crops that allow existing herbicides to be used in a new way. However, over reliance on these traits will result in multiple‐resistance in weeds. Weed control in major crops is at a precarious point, where we must maintain the utility of the herbicides we have until we can transition to new weed management technologies. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds
Heap, I. (1997) · Cited by 3,066
Self-citationThe World’s Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology
HOLM, L. G., PLUCKNETT, D. L., PANCHO, J. V., HERBEBGEB, J. S., HILBIG, W., & Halle, S. (1978) · Pedobiologia · doi:10.1016/s0031-4056(23)00601-7 · Cited by 2,505
Glyphosate: a once‐in‐a‐century herbicide
Duke, S. O., & Powles, S. B. (2008) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.1518 · Cited by 1,749
Self-citationGene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri
Gaines, T. A., Zhang, W., Wang, D., Bukun, B., Chisholm, S. T., Shaner, D. L., Nissen, S. J., Patzoldt, W. L., Tranel, P. J., Culpepper, A. S., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0906649107 · Cited by 648
Why have no new herbicide modes of action appeared in recent years?
Duke, S. O. (2012) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.2333 · Cited by 559
Self-citationWhy glyphosate is a global herbicide: strengths, weaknesses and prospects
Baylis, A. D. (2000) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1526-4998(200004)56:4<299::aid-ps144>3.0.co;2-k · Cited by 539
The history and current status of glyphosate
Duke, S. O. (2018) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.4652 · Cited by 509
Self-citationGlyphosate resistance: state of knowledge
Sammons, R. D., & Gaines, T. A. (2014) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.3743 · Cited by 475
Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware
VanGessel, M. J. (2001) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0703:rprhfd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 458
Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia
Culpepper, A. S., Grey, T. L., Vencill, W. K., Kichler, J. M., Webster, T. M., Brown, S. M., York, A. C., Davis, J. W., & Hanna, W. W. (2006) · Weed Science · doi:10.1614/ws-06-001r.1 · Cited by 423
Cited by
Genetically modified crops: current status and future prospects
Kumar, K., Gambhir, G., Dass, A., Tripathi, A. K., Singh, A., Jha, A. K., Yadava, P., Choudhary, M., & Rakshit, S. (2020) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-020-03372-8 · Cited by 528
Anatomy and resilience of the global production ecosystem
Nyström, M., Jouffray, J.-B., Norström, A. V., Crona, B., Søgaard Jørgensen, P., Carpenter, S. R., Bodin, Ö., Galaz, V., & Folke, C. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1712-3 · Cited by 343
Meftaul, I. M., Venkateswarlu, K., Dharmarajan, R., Annamalai, P., Asaduzzaman, M., Parven, A., & Megharaj, M. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114372 · Cited by 218
Agrochemical pesticide production, trade, and hazard: Narrowing the information gap in Colombia
Valbuena, D., Cely-Santos, M., & Obregón, D. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112141 · Cited by 56
Yang, S. H., Kim, E., Park, H., & Koo, Y. (2022) · Applied Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1186/s13765-022-00679-w · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Heap, I., & Duke, S. O.
- Venue
- Pest Management Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-29
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1040-1049
- ISSN
- 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4998
- OpenAlex
- W2763798658
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 35.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overview of glyphosate‐resistant weeds worldwide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ps.4760
- The paper
- Heap, I., & Duke, S. O. (2018). Overview of glyphosate‐resistant weeds worldwide. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4760
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
