CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 98Polymer-Based Agricultural EnhancementsClay minerals and soil interactionsInsect Pest Control Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potential and actual uses of zeolites in crop protection

De Smedt, Caroline, Someus, Edward, Spanoghe, Pieter·2015·Pest Management Science
DOI 10.1002/ps.3999
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this review, it is demonstrated that zeolites have a potential to be used as crop protection agents. Similarly to kaolin, zeolites can be applied as particle films against pests and diseases. Their honeycomb framework, together with their carbon dioxide sorption capacity and their heat stress reduction capacity, makes them suitable as a leaf coating product. Furthermore, their water sorption capacity and their smaller particle sizes make them effective against fungal diseases and insect pests. Finally, these properties also ensure that zeolites can act as carriers of different active substances, which makes it possible to use zeolites for slow‐release applications. Based on the literature, a general overview is provided of the different basic properties of zeolites as promising products in crop protection. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ps.3999

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zeolite's effectiveness against insects relies on its capacity to remove the insects' outer cuticle through abrasion or adsorption of epicuticular lipids, causing rapid water loss and death by desiccation.

    “zeolite’s effectiveness against insects relies on their capacity to remove the insects’ outer cuticle, through abrasion or through adsorption of epicuticular lipids. The result of both these processes is a rapid water loss from the insect’s body which leads to the insect’s death due to desiccation (De Smedt et al. 2015).”

    From Fundamental properties and sustainable applications of the natural zeolite clinoptilolite (2024) · cites this paper as De Smedt et al. 2015

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 118

  1. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.093 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0921-3449(95)00063-1 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/ps.1049 · DOI
  4. 10.21273/HORTTECH.18.1.144 · DOI
  5. Payra P, 2003, Handbook of Zeolite Science and Technology, 1
  6. Georgiev D, 2009, Proc Int Sci Conf – Economics and Society Development on the Base of Knowledge, 1
  7. 10.1016/S0167-2991(01)80244-5 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0167-2991(07)80790-7 · DOI
  9. Baerlocher C, 2007, Atlas of Zeolite Framework Types, 398
  10. 10.1180/0009855043910119 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60022-X · DOI
  12. 10.2174/1874478811205010020 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.04.024 · DOI
  14. Pavelic KI, 2003, Handbook of Zeolite Science and Technology, 1141
  15. Ramesh K, 2010, Nanoporous zeolites in farming: current status and issues ahead, Curr Sci, 99, 760
  16. Tulod AM, 2012, Growth performance and phytoremediation potential of Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre, Samanea saman (Jacq.) Merr. and Vitex parviflora Juss. in copper‐contaminated soil amended with zeolite and VAM, Asia Life Sci, 21, 499
  17. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.055 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/jctb.3788 · DOI
  19. Mravec D, 2005, Some possibilities of catalytic and noncatalytic utilization of zeolites, Chem Pap, 59, 62
  20. 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3463 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/jee/92.4.759 · DOI
  22. Glenn DM, 2001, Particle film application influences apple leaf physiology, fruit yield, and fruit quality, J Am Soc Hort Sci, 126, 175, 10.21273/JASHS.126.2.175 · DOI
  23. Glenn DM, 2005, Horticultural Reviews, 1
  24. 10.1093/ee/29.2.329 · DOI
  25. 10.3733/ca.v059n01p35 · DOI
  26. 10.1029/2005JB004094 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/ps.943 · DOI
  28. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00084.x · DOI
  29. 10.1002/9783527630882.ch10 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jcat.2009.12.021 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S1572-4352(05)01016-0 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0167-2991(07)80879-2 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0167-2991(04)80799-7 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0167-2991(99)80207-9 · DOI
  35. 10.1021/cm047908z · DOI
  36. 10.1021/la049817m · DOI
  37. 10.1021/la049516c · DOI
  38. Lovatt JC, 2014, Citrus Production Manual, 161
  39. Holding DR, 2013, Plant growth processes: transpiration, photosynthesis and respiration, 10
  40. Bognolo G, 2000, Surface Active Behaviour of Performance Surfactants, 1
  41. McBride J, 2000, Whitewashing agriculture, Agric Res, 48, 14
  42. Steurbaut W, 2001, Symp on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals
  43. 10.1016/S0001-8686(01)00087-2 · DOI
  44. 10.30843/nzpp.2005.58.4244 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/ps.1321 · DOI
  46. Spanoghe P, 2010, Effect van Additieven en Adjuvantia op de Efficiëntie van de Spuittoepassing van Gewasbeschermingsmiddelen
  47. 10.1016/0261-2194(88)90076-2 · DOI
  48. 10.1002/ps.2780010411 · DOI
  49. Gaskin RE, 2000, Novel organosilicone adjuvants to reduce agrochemical spray volumes on row crops, NZ Plant Prot, 53, 350
  50. Gaskin RE, 2002, New adjuvant technology for pesticide use on wine grapes, NZ Plant Prot, 55, 154
  51. Hall FR, 1997, Changes in spray retention by apple leaves during a growing season, HortScience, 32, 858, 10.21273/HORTSCI.32.5.858 · DOI
  52. Norris LA, 1969, Symp on Environmental and Physiologic Chemodynamics
  53. 10.1071/AP05031 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.cropro.2007.02.011 · DOI
  55. 10.1094/PD-75-0231 · DOI
  56. 10.1021/jp048078f · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2007.09.001 · DOI
  58. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x · DOI
  59. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141610 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Grange M, 2004, Effect of kaolin applications on apple fruit quality and gas exchange of apple leaves, Acta Hort, 636, 545, 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.636.69 · DOI
  61. Wünsche JN, 2004, ‘Surround’ particle film applications – effects on whole canopy physiology of apple, Acta Hort, 636, 565, 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.636.72 · DOI
  62. Glenn DM, 2003, Particle films affect carbon assimilation and yield in ‘Empire’ apple, J Am Soc Hort Sci, 128, 356, 10.21273/JASHS.128.3.356 · DOI
  63. 10.1093/aob/mcl252 · DOI
  64. Jifon JL, 2003, Kaolin particle film applications can increase photosynthesis and water use efficiency of ‘Ruby red’ grapefruit leaves, J Am Soc Hort Sci, 128, 107, 10.21273/JASHS.128.1.107 · DOI
  65. 10.4236/ajps.2011.23040 · DOI
  66. 10.1029/WR006i001p00280 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.03.008 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.jbbm.2007.05.010 · DOI
  69. 10.1007/978-81-322-0723-8_7 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/S0255-2701(98)00038-5 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.12.022 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.mseb.2012.01.015 · DOI
  73. Fontana A, 2004, Handbook of Food Analysis: Physical Characterization and Nutrient Analysis, 39
  74. Scott WJ, 1953, Water relations of Staphylococcus aureus at 30 °C, Aust J Biol Sci, 6, 549, 10.1071/BI9530549 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/S0065-2628(08)60247-5 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.cropro.2008.08.005 · DOI
  77. 10.1007/s10658-005-5463-7 · DOI
  78. 10.1603/0022-0493-93.3.744 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/S0261-2194(03)00169-8 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/j.cropro.2007.10.005 · DOI
  81. 10.1603/EC09131 · DOI
  82. 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01233.x · DOI
  83. Moftah A, 2004, Effects of kaolin and pinolene film‐forming polymers on water relations and photosynthetic rate of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.) plants under water deficit conditions, J Appl Hort, 6, 16
  84. Moftah AE, 2005, Effects of antitranspirants on water relations and photosynthetic rate of cultivated tropical plant (Polianthes tuberosa L.), Pol J Ecol, 53, 165
  85. Perez‐Caballero R, 2008, The effect of adding zeolite to soils in order to improve the N‐K nutrition of olive trees. Preliminary results, Am J Agric Biol Sci, 2, 321
  86. Ming DW, 2001, Natural Zeolites: Occurrence, Properties, Applications – Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 323, 10.1515/9781501509117-013 · DOI
  87. 10.1016/S1387-1811(03)00366-4 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/S0167-2991(07)81100-1 · DOI
  89. 10.1021/jf980185h · DOI
  90. 10.1023/A:1010141408724 · DOI
  91. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.09.026 · DOI
  92. Heuskin S, 2011, The use of semiochemical slow‐release devices in integrated pest management strategies, Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ, 15, 459
  93. 10.1021/jf010223o · DOI
  94. 10.1016/S0167-2991(99)80280-8 · DOI
  95. 10.1016/0022-2011(91)90138-G · DOI
  96. 10.1002/ps.2780390205 · DOI
  97. 10.1016/S0141-0229(97)00246-9 · DOI
  98. 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · DOI · Paper page
  99. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00565.x · DOI
  100. 10.1016/0273-1223(96)00004-2 · DOI
  101. 10.1016/j.ces.2005.08.027 · DOI
  102. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.01.001 · DOI
  103. Ooijkaas LP, 2000, Fungal Biopesticide Production by Solid State Fermentation, Growth and Sporulation of Coniothyrium minitans, 10.18174/196591 · DOI
  104. 10.1007/978-0-387-75213-6_1 · DOI
  105. 10.1007/978-0-387-75213-6_2 · DOI
  106. 10.1023/A:1013774728459 · DOI
  107. Hrenovic J, 2002, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis: Impact of Zeolites and Other Porous Materials on the New Technologies at the Beginning of the Millenium – Proceedings of the 2nd International FEZA Conference, 1743
  108. 10.1007/s00253-013-4691-6 · DOI
  109. Kaewchai S, 2009, Mycofungicides and fungal biofertilizers, Fungal Diversity, 38, 25
  110. Pasqualini E, 2007, Particle film technology: approach for a biorational control of Cacopsylla pyri (Rhynchota: Psyllidae) in Northern Italy, Bull Insectol, 55, 39
  111. Dufour R, 2001, Insect IPM in apples – kaolin clay, 1
  112. 2004, Risk assessment of sodium aluminium silicate – zeolite A
  113. 10.1016/j.clay.2013.02.003 · DOI
  114. 10.1533/9781782420491.129 · DOI
  115. 2012, GPS safety summary – zeolite
  116. Kahler B, 2014, A synopsis of the polyvalent qualities of zeolite‐clinoptilolite and the proposed uses within the namibian medical, pharmaceutical, industrial and economical sectors: a proposal for an integrated research, Int Sci Technol J Namibia, 3, 42
  117. 2004, Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the request from the Commission on the use of synthetic sodium aluminium silicate (zeolite) for the reduction of risk of milk fever in dairy cows, EFSA J, 160, 1
  118. 2006, Database of Select Committee on GRAS Substances (SCOGS) Reviews

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
De Smedt, C., Someus, E., & Spanoghe, P.
Affiliations
  • Laboratory of Crop Protection Chemistry, Faculty of Bio‐Science Engineering Ghent University Ghent Belgium
  • Technical Development and Demo Laboratory, Biochar Applied Research Terra Humana Ltd Polgardi Gyula Manor Hungary
  • Ghent University (BE)
ORCID
Spanoghe, Pieter
Venue
Pest Management Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-23
Volume
71
Issue
10
Pages
1355-1367
ISSN
  • 1526-498X (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4998
DOI
10.1002/ps.3999
OpenAlex
W1503149674
Cited by
98
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Pest Management Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ECO-ZEO 7th FWP (282865)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Clay minerals and soil interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
Keywords
zeolites, crop protection, particle films, insect pests, fungal diseases, CO2 sorption, water sorption, heat stress mitigation, kaolin
MeSH terms
Crop Protection, Animals, Fungi, Insecta, Pesticides, Plant Diseases, Zeolites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review