Cited by 454

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Floquet topological insulators

Cayssol, Jérôme, Dóra, Balázs, Simon, Ferenc, Moessner, Roderich·2013·physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters

Abstract

magnified image Topological insulators represent unique phases of matter with insulating bulk and conducting edge or surface states, immune to small perturbations such as backscattering due to disorder. This stems from their peculiar band structure, which provides topological protections. While conventional tools (pressure, doping etc.) to modify the band structure are available, time periodic perturbations can provide tunability by adding time as an extra dimension enhanced to the problem. In this short review, we outline the recent research on topological insulators in non‐equilibrium situations. Firstly, we introduce briefly the Floquet formalism that allows to describe steady states of the electronic system with an effective time‐independent Hamiltonian. Secondly, we summarize recent theoretical work on how light irradiation drives semi‐metallic graphene or a trivial semiconducting system into a topological phase. Finally, we show how photons can be used to probe topological edge or surface states. (© 2013 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pssr.201206451

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such a strategy was considered in various physical contexts, ranging from irradiated materials to ultracold atoms in shaken optical lattices, but it was pioneered in photonic experiments using femtosecond-laser-written lattices.

    “Such a strategy was considered in various physical contexts, ranging from irradiated materials (Oka and Aoki, 2009;Lindner, Refael, and Galitski, 2011;Cayssol et al., 2013) to ultracold atoms in shaken optical lattices (Jotzu et al., 2014;Eckardt, 2017;Fläschner et al., 2018), but it was in fact pioneered in photonic experiments using femtosecond-laser-written lattices (Rechtsman, Zeuner, Plotnik”

    From Topological photonics (2019) · cites this paper as Cayssol et al., 2013

  • In the high-frequency regime, the topological classification of periodically driven systems is strictly equivalent to that of static systems.

    “Consequently, in the high-frequency regime (Ω → ∞), the topological classification of periodically driven systems is strictly equivalent to that of static systems (Kitagawa, Berg et al., 2010;Lindner, Refael, and Galitski, 2011;Cayssol et al., 2013):”

    From Topological photonics (2019) · cites this paper as Cayssol et al., 2013

  • The time-dependent Hamiltonian in Eq. (32) is equivalent to that describing electrons in graphene when irradiated by circularly polarized light.

    “Interestingly, we note that the time-dependent Hamiltonian in Eq. ( 32) is equivalent to that describing electrons in graphene when the latter is irradiated by a circularly polarized light (Oka and Aoki, 2009;Cayssol et al., 2013);”

    From Topological photonics (2019) · cites this paper as Cayssol et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.226801 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.146802 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.1133734 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2015 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.085308 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.236802 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.236803 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.236804 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.085310 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.113102 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.046811 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.220402 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.053639 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.255302 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.235114 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.195125 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.195424 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1063/1.3149495 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/nphys1926 · DOI · Paper page
  21. N. H.Lindner G.Refael andV.Galitski(2011) arXiv: 1111.4518. · arXiv
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.081406 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1063/1.3597412 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.235108 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.125449 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.216601 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.056602 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.035309 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.115110 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevA.7.2203 · DOI
  31. T.Dittrich P.Hanggi G. L.Ingold B.Kramer G.Schon andW.Zwerger(eds.) Quantum Transport and Dissipation (Wiley‐WCH Weinheim 1998).
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.195414 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.017401 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.236601 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.136603 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.227402 · DOI
  37. 10.1088/0268-1242/25/9/095005 · DOI
  38. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/1/015203 · DOI
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.245436 · DOI
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.241306 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/nphys913 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.986 · DOI
  43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.27.6083 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.266801 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/103027 · DOI
  46. 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1523 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.145301 · DOI
  48. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.047401 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cayssol, J., Dóra, B., Simon, F., & Moessner, R.
Venue
physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-28
Volume
7
Issue
1-2
Pages
101-108
ISSN
  • 1862-6254
  • 1862-6270
Cited by
454
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review