CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Realistic Time-Reversal Invariant Topological Insulators with Neutral Atoms

Goldman, N., Satija, I., Nikolic, P., Bermudez, A., Martin-Delgado, M. A., Lewenstein, M., Spielman, I. B.·2010·Physical Review Letters
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.105.255302
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.105.255302

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The experimental realization of a quantum spin Hall version of the Harper-Hofstadter model with a quarter flux per plaquette uses only inductors and capacitors.

    “In what follows, we briefly describe the experimental realization of a quantum spin Hall version of the Harper-Hofstadter model (Goldman et al., 2010) with a quarter flux per plaquette that uses only inductors and capacitors; it was subsequently pointed out (Albert, Glazman, and Jiang, 2015) that a minimal circuit model could be realized at a flux per plaquette of 1=3.”

    From Topological photonics (2019) · cites this paper as Goldman et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.146802 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.1133734 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.045322 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.186807 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.013608 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.14.2239 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1063/1.2945893 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.3894 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.033622 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.070402 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goldman, N., Satija, I., Nikolic, P., Bermudez, A., Martin-Delgado, M. A., Lewenstein, M., & Spielman, I. B.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2010-12-16
Volume
105
Issue
25
ISSN
  • 0031-9007
  • 1079-7114
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.105.255302
Cited by
299
References
8
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review