The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of the bioactivity and potential health benefits of chamomile tea (Matricaria recutita L.)
Abstract
Chamomile (Matricaria recutita L., Chamomilla recutita L., Matricaria chamomilla) is one of the most popular single ingredient herbal teas, or tisanes. Chamomile tea, brewed from dried flower heads, has been used traditionally for medicinal purposes. Evidence‐based information regarding the bioactivity of this herb is presented. The main constituents of the flowers include several phenolic compounds, primarily the flavonoids apigenin, quercetin, patuletin, luteolin and their glucosides. The principal components of the essential oil extracted from the flowers are the terpenoids α‐bisabolol and its oxides and azulenes, including chamazulene. Chamomile has moderate antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, and significant antiplatelet activity in vitro. Animal model studies indicate potent antiinflammatory action, some antimutagenic and cholesterol‐lowering activities, as well as antispasmotic and anxiolytic effects. However, human studies are limited, and clinical trials examining the purported sedative properties of chamomile tea are absent. Adverse reactions to chamomile, consumed as a tisane or applied topically, have been reported among those with allergies to other plants in the daisy family, i.e. Asteraceae or Compositae. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hertog, M. G. L. (1995) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1995.00430040053006 · Cited by 1,853
Cited by
Tungmunnithum, D., Thongboonyou, A., Pholboon, A., & Yangsabai, A. (2018) · Medicines · doi:10.3390/medicines5030093 · Cited by 1,969
Sun, W., & Shahrajabian, M. H. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28041845 · Cited by 806
Anticancer activity of essential oils: a review
Bhalla, Y., Gupta, V. K., & Jaitak, V. (2013) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.6267 · Cited by 276
Nutrition, Well-Being and Health
(2012) · doi:10.5772/1864 · Cited by 178
Münch, G., Venigalla, M., Sonego, S., & Gyengesi, E. (2015) · Neural Regeneration Research · doi:10.4103/1673-5374.162686 · Cited by 160
GABA-modulating phytomedicines for anxiety: A systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence
Savage, K., Firth, J., Stough, C., & Sarris, J. (2018) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.5940 · Cited by 131
Geck, M. S., Cristians, S., Berger-González, M., Casu, L., Heinrich, M., & Leonti, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.01160 · Cited by 74
Anti-inflammatory effects of thyme essential oil in mice
Juhas, Š., Bujňáková, D., Rehák, P., Čikoš, Š., Czikková, S., Veselá, J., Iłková, G., & Koppel, J. (2008) · Acta Veterinaria Brno · doi:10.2754/avb200877030327 · Cited by 48
Ahmad, A., Tahir ul Qamar, M., Shoukat, A., Aslam, M. M., Tariq, M., Hakiman, M., & Joyia, F. A. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.11464 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- McKay, D. L., & Blumberg, J. B.
- Venue
- Phytotherapy Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-20
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 519-530
- ISSN
- 0951-418X (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1573
- OpenAlex
- W2018886644
- Cited by
- 676
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.