Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 78

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of piperine on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of phenytoin in patients with epilepsy

Pattanaik, Smita, Hota, Debasish, Prabhakar, Sudesh, Kharbanda, Parampreet, Pandhi, Promila·2006·Phytotherapy Research

Abstract

Piperine, the active principle of Piper longum, Piper nigrum and Zingiber officinalis, has been reported to enhance the oral bioavailability of phenytoin in human volunteers. The objective of this study was to explore the effect of a single dose of piperine in patients with uncontrolled epilepsy on the steady‐state pharmacokinetics of phenytoin. Two groups of 10 patients each receiving either a 150 mg or 200 mg twice daily dose of phenytoin were selected. Twelve hours after the night dose, venous blood samples were collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 h after administration of phenytoin. On the next study day, piperine 20 mg was administered along with phenytoin and samples were collected similarly. The mean plasma drug concentrations at different time points and the pharmacokinetic parameters before and after piperine administration were compared by Student's t‐test. Piperine increased significantly the mean plasma concentration of phenytoin at most of the time points in both dose groups. There was a significant increase in AUC(0–12h) (p < 0.01), Cmax (p < 0.001) and Ka (p < 0.05) whereas the changes in Kel and tmax were not significant. The results showed that piperine enhanced the bioavailability of phenytoin significantly, possibly by increasing the absorption. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ptr.1937

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Anand N, 1990, Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry, 113
  2. Atal CK, 1985, Biochemical basis of enhanced drug availability of piperine: A potential inhibitory drug metabolism, J Pharm Exp Ther, 232, 258
  3. 10.1055/s-2006-962814 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/BF00314996 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1006/phrs.1999.0640 · DOI
  6. Joshi MV, 1990, Simultaneous HPLC measurements of phenobarbitone, phenytoin and carbamazepine from plasma samples, Indian J Pharmacol, 22, 177
  7. 10.1078/0944-7113-00114 · DOI
  8. Khajuria A, 1998, Permeability characteristic of piperine on oral absorption – an active alkaloid from peppers as a bioavailability enhancer, Indian J Exp Biol, 36, 46
  9. Lowenstein DH, 2005, Harrison's Principle of Internal Medicine, 2357
  10. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0100 · DOI
  11. Ritschel WA, 1999, Handbook of Basic Pharmacokinetics: Including Clinical Applications
  12. Singh J, 1986, Piperine mediated inhibition of glucuronidation in intestine: Evidence that piperine lowers the endogenous UDP‐glucuronic acid content, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 236, 488
  13. 10.1007/BF03226378 · DOI
  14. Zutsi U, 1984, Influence of piperine on rifampicin blood levels in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, J Assoc Physicians India, 33, 223

Metadata

Authors
Pattanaik, S., Hota, D., Prabhakar, S., Kharbanda, P., & Pandhi, P.
Venue
Phytotherapy Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-12
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
683-686
ISSN
  • 0951-418X
  • 1099-1573
Cited by
78
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.