Cited by 5Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesClimate variability and modelsMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Using multiple passive tracers to identify the importance of the North Brazil undercurrent for Atlantic cold tongue variability

White, R. H.·2015·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

The use of multiple passive tracers in a dynamical ocean model is presented as a method to study water mass origins. The multiple passive tracer method is successfully applied to determine the origin regions of the Atlantic cold tongue (ACT), using 31 passive tracers. At the time of the ACT minimum in sea surface temperature, 38 ± 3% of the surface water in the central equatorial Atlantic is found to originate in the western side of the basin, with only 11 ± 2% originating in the east. Conversely, for the ACT surface cooling off the west coast of Africa, only 2 ± 1% is from the west of the Atlantic basin, with 71 ± 7% from the east. The region of the North Brazil undercurrent is found to be the most important origin region for the central Atlantic ACT region, for a 6–8 month lead time. Using the Met Office EN4 observational dataset of ocean temperatures, correlations are found between January temperatures in the North Brazil undercurrent region and both the ACT mean temperature and ACT spatial extent in July–August, significant at the 0.95 level. This suggests that the 6‐month lead‐time predictability of the ACT may be increased by improved knowledge of the North Brazil undercurrent temperature. Results from previous studies suggest that such increased predictability of the ACT could potentially help improve predictions of the West African monsoon.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.2536

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variations of nitrate concentration in the source waters of the NBUC may be another driver of nitrate variations in the EUC and may impact nitrate changes in the center of the basin.

    “the nitrate concentration in the source waters of the NBUC may be another driver of nitrate variations in the EUC as suggested by White (2015)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, R. H.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
White, R. H.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-06
Volume
141
Issue
692
Pages
2505-2517
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2133082454
Cited by
5
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
BP Environmental Technology Program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
Atlantic cold tongue, water mass origin, equatorial Atlantic, sea surface temperature variability, ocean predictability, West African monsoon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review