The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimal nonlinear objective analysis
Abstract
Some practical problems in objective analysis for numerical weather prediction are best solved by using nonlinear analysis equations. They include the existence of nonlinear prior constraints on the analysis, and the use of observations which are nonlinearly related to the analysis parameters, or which have non‐Gaussian error distributions. Bayesian methods are used to derive equations for the optimal (maximum likelihood) nonlinear analysis. It is shown how to incorporate a strong constraint that the four‐dimensional evolution of the analysis should be consistent with a NWP model, by reduction of the control variable to the space‐dimensioned initial field for the model. The iterative solution of the nonlinear analysis equation then involves the integration of the NWP model, and its adjoint. The behaviour of the nonlinear equations is demonstrated with a simple one‐dimensional shallow‐water model. It is shown that time‐tendency information, and indirect observations such as wind speed, or the movement of a tracer, can be used in the analysis. The resulting forecasts are better than those made from an analysis from a traditional analysis‐forecast cycle. The nonlinear method is shown to be capable of ‘moving’ a discontinuity similar to a front, to fit observations defining its position, thus giving an analysis with more detail than would be expected from the spatial resolution of the observations. The incorporation of additional nonlinear constraints, such as that used in initialization, is demonstrated. The method can be used to effectively reject observations with gross errors, by specifying a non‐Gaussian error distribution. However, this generates multiple minima which complicate the search for the best analysis, so the complex decision‐taking algorithms associated with other methods of quality control are not avoided. The convergence properties of iterative methods of solution, and approximations to the ideal equations, are studied, in order to provide some indication as to whether the nonlinear effects might be allowed for in a practical analysis scheme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability
Kalnay, E. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802270 · Cited by 3,391
The ECMWF implementation of three‐dimensional variational assimilation (3D‐Var). I: Formulation
Courtier, P., Andersson, E., Heckley, W., Vasiljevic, D., Hamrud, M., Hollingsworth, A., Rabier, F., Fisher, M., & Pailleux, J. (1998) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49712455002 · Cited by 668
Impact of ERS scatterometer winds in ECMWF’s assimilation system.
Isaksen, L., & Janssen, P. A. E. M. (2004) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1256/qj.03.110 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorenc, A. C.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 479
- Pages
- 205-240
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W2145749368
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal nonlinear objective analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49711447911
- The paper
- Lorenc, A. C. (1988). Optimal nonlinear objective analysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711447911
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.