Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 514

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Variability of summer rainfall over tropical north Africa (1906–92): Observations and modelling

Rowell, David P., Folland, Chris K., Maskell, Kathy, Ward, M. Neil·1995·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

The nature and causes of seasonal (July to September (JAS)) rainfall variability over tropical north Africa are investigated using a combination of empirical and modelling approaches. Concentration is focused on three regions: the Sahel, Soudan and Guinea Coast. The variability of seasonal rainfall through the twentieth century is analysed for each region. The well known dipole of anomalies between the Sahel and Guinea Coast is evident, and new analysis reveals that this fluctuates primarily on time‐scales of five years or less. Attention is then focussed on the causes of rainfall variability in each region, by examining the relationships with global sea‐surface‐temperature (SST) patterns; a partitioning of the data into low‐ and high‐frequency components is found to be particularly useful. So as to attribute more convincingly the primary cause of seasonal rainfall variability to global SST forcing, a suite of general circulation model experiments are performed, aimed at simulating JAS rainfall anomalies for ten past years between 1949 and 1990. Each is forced by the observed SST patterns for the appropriate year. In almost every case, the model quite skilfully simulates the magnitude and pattern of JAS rainfall anomalies across tropical north Africa, thus strengthening the idea that global SST variations are indeed responsible for most of the variability of seasonal rainfall. The relative impact of two additional sources of variability is also investigated. First the role of internal atmospheric variability is quantified (using an ‘analysis of variance’ technique), and found to be small in all three regions. Second, and perhaps more controversially, the possible effects of land‐surface‐moisture feedback are explored. This is done by replacing the normal interactive soil‐moisture scheme with a model‐derived climatology; results suggest that in some years moisture evaporated from the land surface may play a key role, but that in general SST forcing still dominates. Finally, an assessment of the model's skill at sub‐seasonal time‐scales reveals that fluctuations of monthly rainfall about each year's seasonal mean (intra seasonal variations) are insensitive to SST forcing, in part due to a larger influence of internal atmospheric variations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.49712152311

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 514

Metadata

Authors
Rowell, D. P., Folland, C. K., Maskell, K., & Ward, M. N.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-04
Volume
121
Issue
523
Pages
669-704
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2007965426
Cited by
514
References
1
FWCI
25.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variability of summer rainfall over tropical north Africa (1906–92): Observations and modelling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49712152311
The paper
Rowell, D. P., Folland, C. K., Maskell, K., & Ward, M. N. (1995). Variability of summer rainfall over tropical north Africa (1906–92): Observations and modelling. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712152311

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.