Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A probability and decision‐model analysis of PROVOST seasonal multi‐model ensemble integrations

Palmer, T. N., Branković, Č, Richardson, D. S.·2000·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

A probabilistic analysis is made of seasonal ensemble integrations from the PROVOST project (PRediction Of climate Variations On Seasonal to interannual Time‐scales), with emphasis on the Brier score and related Murphy decomposition, and the relative operating characteristic. To illustrate the significance of these results to potential users, results from the analysis of the relative operating characteristic are input to a simple decision model. The decision‐model analysis is used to define a user‐specific objective measure of the economic value of seasonal forecasts. The analysis is made for two simple meteorological forecast conditions or ‘events’, E, based on 850 hPa temperature. The ensemble integrations result from integrating four different models over the period 1979–93. For each model a set of 9‐member ensembles is generated by running from consecutive analyses. Results from the Brier skill score analysis taken over all northern hemisphere grid points indicate that, whilst the skill of individual‐model ensembles is only marginally higher than a probabilistic forecast of climatological frequencies, the multi‐model ensemble is substantially more skilful than climatology. Both reliability and resolution are better for the multi‐model ensemble than for the individual‐model ensembles. This improvement arises both from the use of different models in the ensemble, and from the enhanced ensemble size obtained by combining individual‐model ensembles; the latter reason was found to be the more important. Brier skill scores are higher for years in which there were moderate or strong El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events. Over Europe, only the multi‐model ensembles showed skill over climatology. Similar conclusions are reached from an analysis of the relative operating characteristic. Results from the decision‐model analysis show that the economic value of seasonal forecasts is strongly dependent on the cost, C, to the user of taking precautionary action against E, in relation to the potential loss, L, if precautionary action is not taken and E occurs. However, based on the multi‐model ensemble data, the economic value can be as much as 50% of the value of a hypothetical perfect deterministic forecast. For the hemisphere as a whole, value is enhanced by restriction to ENSO years. It is shown that there is potential economic value in seasonal forecasts for European users. However, the impact of ENSO on economic value over Europe is mixed; value is enhanced by El Niño only for some potential users with specific C/L. The techniques developed are applicable to complex E for arbitrary regions. Hence these techniques are proposed as the basis of an objective probabilistic and decision‐model evaluation of operational seasonal ensemble forecasts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.49712656703

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Palmer, T. N., Branković, Č., & Richardson, D. S.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-07
Volume
126
Issue
567
Pages
2013-2033
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2100944635
Cited by
189
References
1
FWCI
16.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A probability and decision‐model analysis of PROVOST seasonal multi‐model ensemble integrations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49712656703
The paper
Palmer, T. N., Branković, Č., & Richardson, D. S. (2000). A probability and decision‐model analysis of PROVOST seasonal multi‐model ensemble integrations. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656703

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.