Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 793

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On Some Aspects of Variable Selection for Partial Least Squares Regression Models

Roy, Partha Pratim, Roy, Kunal·2008·QSAR & Combinatorial Science

Abstract

This paper tries to explore the optimum variable selection strategy for Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression using a model dataset of cytoprotection data. The compounds of the dataset were classified using K‐means clustering technique applied on standardized descriptor matrix and ten combinations of training and test sets were generated based on the obtained clusters. For a particular training set, PLS models were developed with a number of components optimized by leave‐one‐out Q2 and then the developed models were validated (externally) using the test set compounds. For each set, PLS model was initially constructed using all descriptors (variables). The variables having least standardized values of regression coefficients were deleted and the next model was developed with a reduced set of variables. These steps were performed several times until further reduction in number of variables did not improve Q2 value. In each case, statistical parameters like predictive R2 (R2pred), squared correlation coefficient between observed and predicted values with (r2) and without ($\rm{ r_0^{\rm{2}} }$) intercept and Root Mean Square Error of Prediction (RMSEP) were calculated from the test set compounds. In case of all ten sets, Q2 values steadily increase on deletion of variables while R2pred values do not show any specific trend. In no case, the highest Q2 and highest R2pred appear in the same trial, i.e., with the same combinations of variables. This suggests that from the viewpoint of external predictability, choice of variables for PLS based on Q2 value may not be optimum. Moreover, a clear separation of r2 and r02 curves in some sets suggests that such models may not be truly predictive in spite of acceptable R2pred values. Another observation is that coefficient of determination R2 for the training set is more immune to changes on deletion of variables than the validation parameters like Q2 and R2pred. Finally, a new parameter rm2 has been suggested to indicate external predictability of QSAR models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qsar.200710043

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 793

Metadata

Authors
Roy, P. P., & Roy, K.
Venue
QSAR & Combinatorial Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
302-313
ISSN
  • 1611-020X (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-0218
OpenAlex
W2011580004
Cited by
793
References
2
FWCI
36.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Some Aspects of Variable Selection for Partial Least Squares Regression Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qsar.200710043
The paper
Roy, P. P., & Roy, K. (2008). On Some Aspects of Variable Selection for Partial Least Squares Regression Models. QSAR & Combinatorial Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/qsar.200710043

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.