Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding machine‐learned density functionals

Open access
Li, Li, Snyder, John C., Pelaschier, Isabelle M., Huang, Jessica, Niranjan, Uma‐Naresh, Duncan, Paul, Rupp, Matthias, Müller, Klaus‐Robert, Burke, Kieron·2016·International Journal of Quantum Chemistry

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is an increasingly popular statistical tool for analyzing either measured or calculated data sets. Here, we explore its application to a well‐defined physics problem, investigating issues of how the underlying physics is handled by ML, and how self‐consistent solutions can be found by limiting the domain in which ML is applied. The particular problem is how to find accurate approximate density functionals for the kinetic energy (KE) of noninteracting electrons. Kernel ridge regression is used to approximate the KE of non‐interacting fermions in a one dimensional box as a functional of their density. The properties of different kernels and methods of cross‐validation are explored, reproducing the physics faithfully in some cases, but not others. We also address how self‐consistency can be achieved with information on only a limited electronic density domain. Accurate constrained optimal densities are found via a modified Euler‐Lagrange constrained minimization of the machine‐learned total energy, despite the poor quality of its functional derivative. A projected gradient descent algorithm is derived using local principal component analysis. Additionally, a sparse grid representation of the density can be used without degrading the performance of the methods. The implications for machine‐learned density functional approximations are discussed. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qua.25040

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Li, L., Snyder, J. C., Pelaschier, I. M., Huang, J., Niranjan, U., Duncan, P., Rupp, M., Müller, K., & Burke, K.
Venue
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-17
Volume
116
Issue
11
Pages
819-833
ISSN
  • 0020-7608 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-461X
OpenAlex
W1870970165
Cited by
193
References
6
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding machine‐learned density functionals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qua.25040
The paper
Li, L., Snyder, J. C., Pelaschier, I. M., Huang, J., Niranjan, U., Duncan, P., Rupp, M., Müller, K., & Burke, K. (2016). Understanding machine‐learned density functionals. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.25040

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.