The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding machine‐learned density functionals
Open accessAbstract
Machine learning (ML) is an increasingly popular statistical tool for analyzing either measured or calculated data sets. Here, we explore its application to a well‐defined physics problem, investigating issues of how the underlying physics is handled by ML, and how self‐consistent solutions can be found by limiting the domain in which ML is applied. The particular problem is how to find accurate approximate density functionals for the kinetic energy (KE) of noninteracting electrons. Kernel ridge regression is used to approximate the KE of non‐interacting fermions in a one dimensional box as a functional of their density. The properties of different kernels and methods of cross‐validation are explored, reproducing the physics faithfully in some cases, but not others. We also address how self‐consistency can be achieved with information on only a limited electronic density domain. Accurate constrained optimal densities are found via a modified Euler‐Lagrange constrained minimization of the machine‐learned total energy, despite the poor quality of its functional derivative. A projected gradient descent algorithm is derived using local principal component analysis. Additionally, a sparse grid representation of the density can be used without degrading the performance of the methods. The implications for machine‐learned density functional approximations are discussed. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
Generalized Neural-Network Representation of High-Dimensional Potential-Energy Surfaces
Behler, J., & Parrinello, M. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.146401 · Cited by 5,010
Gaussian Approximation Potentials: The Accuracy of Quantum Mechanics, without the Electrons
Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R., & Csányi, G. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.136403 · Cited by 3,242
Fast and Accurate Modeling of Molecular Atomization Energies with Machine Learning
Rupp, M., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R., & von Lilienfeld, O. A. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.058301 · Cited by 2,312
Self-citationForecasting stock market movement direction with support vector machine
Huang, W., Nakamori, Y., & Wang, S.-Y. (2005) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2004.03.016 · Cited by 1,119
Hansen, K., Biegler, F., Ramakrishnan, R., Pronobis, W., von Lilienfeld, O. A., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2015) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00831 · Cited by 815
Cited by
Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data
Karpatne, A., Atluri, G., Faghmous, J. H., Steinbach, M., Banerjee, A., Ganguly, A., Shekhar, S., Samatova, N., & Kumar, V. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2017.2720168 · Cited by 1,752
From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science–a review
Schleder, G. R., Padilha, A. C. M., Acosta, C. M., Costa, M., & Fazzio, A. (2019) · Journal of Physics: Materials · doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b · Cited by 852
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Self-citationBypassing the Kohn-Sham equations with machine learning
Brockherde, F., Vogt, L., Li, L., Tuckerman, M. E., Burke, K., & Müller, K.-R. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00839-3 · Cited by 707
Self-citationBig-Data Science in Porous Materials: Materials Genomics and Machine Learning
Jablonka, K. M., Ongari, D., Moosavi, S. M., & Smit, B. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00004 · Cited by 599
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Snyder, J. C., Pelaschier, I. M., Huang, J., Niranjan, U., Duncan, P., Rupp, M., Müller, K., & Burke, K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-11-17
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 819-833
- ISSN
- 0020-7608 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-461X
- OpenAlex
- W1870970165
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding machine‐learned density functionals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qua.25040
- The paper
- Li, L., Snyder, J. C., Pelaschier, I. M., Huang, J., Niranjan, U., Duncan, P., Rupp, M., Müller, K., & Burke, K. (2016). Understanding machine‐learned density functionals. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.25040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.