Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 465

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oxygen isotopes in nitrate: new reference materials for 18 O: 17 O: 16 O measurements and observations on nitrate‐water equilibration

Böhlke, J. K., Mroczkowski, S. J., Coplen, T. B.·2003·Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

Despite a rapidly growing literature on analytical methods and field applications of O isotope‐ratio measurements of NO 3 − in environmental studies, there is evidence that the reported data may not be comparable because reference materials with widely varying δ 18 O values have not been readily available. To address this problem, we prepared large quantities of two nitrate salts with contrasting O isotopic compositions for distribution as reference materials for O isotope‐ratio measurements: USGS34 (KNO 3 ) with low δ 18 O and USGS35 (NaNO 3 ) with high δ 18 O and ‘mass‐independent’ δ 17 O. The procedure used to produce USGS34 involved equilibration of HNO 3 with 18 O‐depleted meteoric water. Nitric acid equilibration is proposed as a simple method for producing laboratory NO 3 − reference materials with a range of δ 18 O values and normal (mass‐dependent) 18 O: 17 O: 16 O variation. Preliminary data indicate that the equilibrium O isotope‐fractionation factor ( α ) between [NO 3 − ] and H 2 O decreases with increasing temperature from 1.0215 at 22°C to 1.0131 at 100°C. USGS35 was purified from the nitrate ore deposits of the Atacama Desert in Chile and has a high 17 O: 18 O ratio owing to its atmospheric origin. These new reference materials, combined with previously distributed NO 3 − isotopic reference materials IAEA‐N3 (=IAEA‐NO‐3) and USGS32, can be used to calibrate local laboratory reference materials for determining offset values, scale factors, and mass‐independent effects on N and O isotope‐ratio measurements in a wide variety of environmental NO 3 − samples. Preliminary analyses yield the following results (normalized with respect to VSMOW and SLAP, with reproducibilities of ±0.2–0.3‰, 1 σ ): IAEA‐N3 has δ 18 O = +25.6‰ and δ 17 O = +13.2‰; USGS32 has δ 18 O = +25.7‰; USGS34 has δ 18 O = −27.9‰ and δ 17 O = −14.8‰; and USGS35 has δ 18 O = +57.5‰ and δ 17 O = +51.5‰. Published in 2003 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rcm.1123

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 465

Metadata

Authors
Böhlke, J. K., Mroczkowski, S. J., & Coplen, T. B.
Venue
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-07-04
Volume
17
Issue
16
Pages
1835-1846
ISSN
  • 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0231
OpenAlex
W2000522044
Cited by
465
References
32
FWCI
15.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxygen isotopes in nitrate: new reference materials for 18 O: 17 O: 16 O measurements and observations on nitrate‐water equilibration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rcm.1123
The paper
Böhlke, J. K., Mroczkowski, S. J., & Coplen, T. B. (2003). Oxygen isotopes in nitrate: new reference materials for 18 O: 17 O: 16 O measurements and observations on nitrate‐water equilibration. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1123

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.