The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Delayed extraction matrix‐assisted laser desorption time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry
Abstract
A new delayed extraction matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time‐of‐flight (TOF) mass spectrometer system is described which provides dramatically improved performance over that obtained with identical TOF analyzers operated with constant electrical fields. In this system the ions formed by MALDI are produced in a weak electrical field, and subsequently extracted by application of a high voltage pulse after a predetermined time delay. Three parameters can be independently adjusted to optimize the performance. These include the field magnitude and direction during and immediately following ion production, the magnitude of the extraction field, and the time delay between the laser pulse and application of the extraction field. Theoretical equations are presented which guide the selection of these parameters to optimize the performance. Results are presented from three TOF analyzers of similar design, but ranging in size from a 1.3 m linear analyzer to a 6.4 m reflector. In all cases delayed extraction provides substantially improved resolution over that obtained from static operation. In the smallest linear analyzer resolution of M/ΔM (full width at half maximum) of 4000 is demonstrated for angiotensin I, and with the largest reflecting analyzer, the isotope peaks of bovine insulin are resolved nearly to baseline. With larger proteins, the isotopic peaks are not resolved, but resolution approaching the width of the isotopic envelope is obtained. Resolution improvement is demonstrated for proteins up to 30 kDa. In addition to improved resolution, delayed extraction is shown to improve the quality of MALDI mass spectra by suppressing matrix background, reducing chemical noise, and minimizing the effect of laser intensity on performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
McDonnell, L. A., & Heeren, R. M. A. (2007) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20124 · Cited by 1,082
Definitions of terms relating to mass spectrometry (IUPAC Recommendations 2013)
Murray, K. K., Boyd, R. K., Eberlin, M. N., Langley, G. J., Li, L., & Naito, Y. (2013) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac-rec-06-04-06 · Cited by 687
Atmospheric Pressure Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry
Laiko, V. V., Baldwin, M. A., & Burlingame, A. L. (2000) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac990998k · Cited by 411
High level multiplex genotyping by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
Ross, P., Hall, L., Smirnov, I., & Haff, L. (1998) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/4328 · Cited by 408
Loboda, A. V., Krutchinsky, A. N., Bromirski, M., Ens, W., & Standing, K. G. (2000) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/1097-0231(20000630)14:12<1047::aid-rcm990>3.0.co;2-e · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Vestal, M. L., Juhasz, P., & Martin, S. A.
- Venue
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1044-1050
- ISSN
- 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0231
- OpenAlex
- W2135842532
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delayed extraction matrix‐assisted laser desorption time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rcm.1290091115
- The paper
- Vestal, M. L., Juhasz, P., & Martin, S. A. (1995). Delayed extraction matrix‐assisted laser desorption time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1290091115
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.