Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mass spectrometry for the detection of differentially expressed proteins: a comparison of surface‐enhanced laser desorption/ionization and capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry

Open access
Neuhoff, Nils v., Kaiser, Thorsten, Wittke, Stefan, Krebs, Ronald, Pitt, Andrew, Burchard, Aurea, Sundmacher, Astrid, Schlegelberger, Brigitte, Kolch, Walter, Mischak, Harald·2004·Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

The discovery of biomarkers is currently attracting much interest as it harbors great potential for the diagnosis and monitoring of human diseases. Here we have used two advanced mass spectroscopy based technologies, surface enhanced laser desorption ionization (SELDI‐MS) and capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry (CE/MS), to obtain proteomic patterns of urine samples from patients suffering from membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) and healthy volunteers. The results indicate that CE/MS analysis is able to display a rich and complex pattern of polypeptides with high resolution and high mass accuracy. In order to analyze these patterns, the MosaiqueVisu software was developed for peak identification, deconvolution and the display of refined maps in a three‐dimensional format. The polypeptide profiles obtained with SELDI‐MS from the same samples are much sparser and show lower resolution and mass accuracy. The SELDI‐MS profiles are further heavily dependent on analyte concentration. SELDI‐MS analysis identified three differentially expressed polypeptides, which are potential biomarkers that can distinguish healthy donors from patients with MGN. In contrast, approximately 200 potential biomarkers could be identified by CE/MS. Thus, while SELDI‐MS is easy to use and requires very little sample, CE/MS generates much richer data sets that enable an in‐depth analysis. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rcm.1294

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Neuhoff, N. V., Kaiser, T., Wittke, S., Krebs, R., Pitt, A., Burchard, A., Sundmacher, A., Schlegelberger, B., Kolch, W., & Mischak, H.
Venue
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-12-18
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
149-156
ISSN
  • 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0231
OpenAlex
W2045674583
Cited by
200
References
1
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mass spectrometry for the detection of differentially expressed proteins: a comparison of surface‐enhanced laser desorption/ionization and capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rcm.1294
The paper
Neuhoff, N. V., Kaiser, T., Wittke, S., Krebs, R., Pitt, A., Burchard, A., Sundmacher, A., Schlegelberger, B., Kolch, W., & Mischak, H. (2004). Mass spectrometry for the detection of differentially expressed proteins: a comparison of surface‐enhanced laser desorption/ionization and capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1294

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.