The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of stable isotope techniques for N 2 O source partitioning in soils: recent progress, remaining challenges and future considerations
Open accessAbstract
Nitrous oxide is produced in soil during several processes, which may occur simultaneously within different micro‐sites of the same soil. Stable isotope techniques have a crucial role to play in the attribution of N 2 O emissions to different microbial processes, through estimation (natural abundance, site preference) or quantification (enrichment) of processes based on the 15 N and 18 O signatures of N 2 O determined by isotope ratio mass spectrometry. These approaches have the potential to become even more powerful when linked with recent developments in secondary isotope mass spectrometry, with microbial ecology, and with modelling approaches, enabling sources of N 2 O to be considered at a wide range of scales and related to the underlying microbiology. Such source partitioning of N 2 O is inherently challenging, but is vital to close the N 2 O budget and to better understand controls on the different processes, with a view to developing appropriate management practices for mitigation of N 2 O. In this respect, it is essential that as many of the contributing processes as possible are considered in any study aimed at source attribution, as mitigation strategies for one process may not be appropriate for another. To aid such an approach, here the current state of the art is critically examined, remaining challenges are highlighted, and recommendations are made for future direction. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mathieu, O., Hénault, C., Lévêque, J., Baujard, E., Milloux, M.-J., & Andreux, F. (2006) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2006.02.005 · Cited by 163
Cited by
Hu, H.-W., Chen, D., & He, J.-Z. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv021 · Cited by 800
Kookana, R. S., Sarmah, A. K., Van Zwieten, L., Krull, E., & Singh, B. (2011) · Advances in agronomy · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385538-1.00003-2 · Cited by 712
Richardson, D., Felgate, H., Watmough, N., Thomson, A., & Baggs, E. (2009) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.03.009 · Cited by 549
Self-citationNitrifier denitrification as a distinct and significant source of nitrous oxide from soil
Kool, D. M., Dolfing, J., Wrage, N., & Van Groenigen, J. W. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.030 · Cited by 490
Case, S. D. C., McNamara, N. P., Reay, D. S., & Whitaker, J. (2012) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.017 · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- Baggs, E. M.
- Venue
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04-25
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1664-1672
- ISSN
- 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0231
- OpenAlex
- W2142891106
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of stable isotope techniques for N 2 O source partitioning in soils: recent progress, remaining challenges and future considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rcm.3456
- The paper
- Baggs, E. M. (2008). A review of stable isotope techniques for N 2 O source partitioning in soils: recent progress, remaining challenges and future considerations. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.