The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Study of latent fingermarks by matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging of endogenous lipids
Abstract
Identification of suspects via fingermark analysis is one of the mainstays of forensic science. The success in matching fingermarks, using conventional fingermark scanning and database searching, strongly relies on the enhancement method adopted for fingermark recovery; this in turn depends on the components present in the fingermarks, which will change over time. This work aims to develop a robust methodology for improved analytical detection of the fingermark components. For the first time, matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI‐MSI) has been used to image endogenous lipids from fresh and aged, groomed and ungroomed fingermarks. The methodology was initially developed using oleic acid which was detected along with its degradation products over a 7‐day period, at three different temperatures in a time‐course experiment. The optimised methodology was then transferred to the imaging analysis of real fingermark samples. Fingermark patterns were reconstructed by retrieving the m/z values of oleic acid and its degradation products. This allowed the three aged fingermarks to be distinguished. In order to prove that MALDI‐MSI can be used in a non‐destructive way, a simple washing protocol was adopted which returned a fingermark that could be further investigated with classical forensic approaches. The work reported here proves the potential and the feasibility of MALDI‐MSI for the forensic analysis of fingermarks, thus making it competitive with other MSI techniques such as desorption electrospray ionisation (DESI)‐MS. The feasibility of using MALDI‐MSI in fingermark ageing studies is also demonstrated along with the potential to be integrated into routine fingermark forensic analysis. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Imaging of Biological Samples: Localization of Peptides and Proteins Using MALDI-TOF MS
Caprioli, R. M., Farmer, T. B., & Gile, J. (1997) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac970888i · Cited by 2,234
Cited by
MALDI Imaging of Lipid Biochemistry in Tissues by Mass Spectrometry
Zemski Berry, K. A., Hankin, J. A., Barkley, R. M., Spraggins, J. M., Caprioli, R. M., & Murphy, R. C. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200280p · Cited by 386
Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry
Verbeeck, N., Caprioli, R. M., & Van de Plas, R. (2020) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21602 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolstenholme, R., Bradshaw, R., Clench, M. R., & Francese, S.
- Venue
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-08-26
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 3031-3039
- ISSN
- 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0231
- OpenAlex
- W1977192431
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study of latent fingermarks by matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging of endogenous lipids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rcm.4218
- The paper
- Wolstenholme, R., Bradshaw, R., Clench, M. R., & Francese, S. (2009). Study of latent fingermarks by matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging of endogenous lipids. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.