The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Species identification by analysis of bone collagen using matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionisation time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry
Abstract
Species identification of fragmentary bone, such as in rendered meat and bone meal or from archaeological sites, is often difficult in the absence of clear morphological markers. Here we present a robust method of analysing genus‐specific collagen peptides by mass spectrometry simply by using solid‐phase extraction (a C18 ZipTip®) for peptide purification, rather than liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). Analysis of the collagen from 32 different mammal species identified a total of 92 peptide markers that could be used for species identification, for example, in processed food and animal feed. A set of ancient (>100 ka@10°C) bone samples was also analysed to show that the proposed method has applications to archaeological bone identification. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peptide mass fingerprinting using MALDI-TOF MS is the basis of ZooMS.
“Peptide mass fingerprinting using MALDI–time-of-flight (TOF) MS is the basis of zooarchaeology by MS (ZooMS) (50).”
From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
Montgelard, C., Catzeflis, F. M., & Douzery, E. (1997) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025792 · Cited by 279
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.4315/0362-028X-68.9.1860 · DOI
- 10.1039/B312593A · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<1099:SPOOPA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gca.2006.01.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/0076-6879(93)24010-R · DOI
- 10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00381-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ab.2007.12.002 · DOI
- Boessneck J, 1969, Science in Archaeology
- BuckleyM.Species identification in ancient and heated bone fragments using protein mass spectrometry.Unpublished PhD thesis University of York York 2008.
- 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.03.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2009.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00106-4 · DOI
- Garrido‐Varo A, 2005, Stratfeed: Strategies and Methods To Detect and Quantify Mammalian Tissues in Feeding Stuffs
- 10.1002/rcm.3679 · DOI
- 10.1002/elps.200600381 · DOI
- 10.1002/jbmr.5650080612 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)75855-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-152808-9.50013-4 · DOI
- 10.22358/jafs/67779/2003 · DOI
- Chiappini B, 2005, J AOAC Int., 88, 1399, 10.1093/jaoac/88.5.1399 · DOI
- 10.1006/mcpr.2000.0336 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.07.013 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.87.16.6127 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature07446 · DOI
- Baeten V, 2004, Strategies and Methods To Detect and Quantify Mammalian tissues in feeding Stuffs, 12
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A guide to ancient protein studies
Hendy, J., Welker, F., Demarchi, B., Speller, C., Warinner, C., & Collins, M. J. (2018) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0510-x · Cited by 291
Self-citationProtein sequences bound to mineral surfaces persist into deep time
Demarchi, B., Hall, S., Roncal-Herrero, T., Freeman, C. L., Woolley, J., Crisp, M. K., Wilson, J., Fotakis, A., Fischer, R., Kessler, B. M., et al. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.17092 · Cited by 279
Self-citationMid-Pliocene warm-period deposits in the high arctic yield insight into camel evolution
Rybczynski, N., Gosse, J. C., Richard Harington, C., Wogelius, R. A., Hidy, A. J., & Buckley, M. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2516 · Cited by 217
Self-citationAncient protein analysis in archaeology
Hendy, J. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb9314 · Cited by 161
Ancient Biomolecules and Evolutionary Inference
Cappellini, E., Prohaska, A., Racimo, F., Welker, F., Pedersen, M. W., Allentoft, M. E., de Barros Damgaard, P., Gutenbrunner, P., Dunne, J., Hammann, S., et al. (2018) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012002 · Cited by 118
Empirical evaluation of bone extraction protocols
Cleland, T. P., Voegele, K., & Schweitzer, M. H. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031443 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Buckley, M., Collins, M., Thomas‐Oates, J., & Wilson, J. C.
- Venue
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 3843-3854
- ISSN
- 0951-4198
- 1097-0231
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
