Cited by 118Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesPaleopathology and ancient diseases

Ancient Biomolecules and Evolutionary Inference

Open access
Cappellini, Enrico, Prohaska, Ana, Racimo, Fernando, Welker, Frido, Pedersen, Mikkel Winther, Allentoft, Morten E., de Barros Damgaard, Peter, Gutenbrunner, Petra +11 more·2018·Annual Review of Biochemistry

Abstract

Over the past three decades, studies of ancient biomolecules—particularly ancient DNA, proteins, and lipids—have revolutionized our understanding of evolutionary history. Though initially fraught with many challenges, today the field stands on firm foundations. Researchers now successfully retrieve nucleotide and amino acid sequences, as well as lipid signatures, from progressively older samples, originating from geographic areas and depositional environments that, until recently, were regarded as hostile to long-term preservation of biomolecules. Sampling frequencies and the spatial and temporal scope of studies have also increased markedly, and with them the size and quality of the data sets generated. This progress has been made possible by continuous technical innovations in analytical methods, enhanced criteria for the selection of ancient samples, integrated experimental methods, and advanced computational approaches. Here, we discuss the history and current state of ancient biomolecule research, its applications to evolutionary inference, and future directions for this young and exciting field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012002

Cites

173 of 173 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The archaeological and palaeoecological value of wetlands and ditches often comes primarily through anoxic conditions allowing for the survival of materials that in drier contexts would decompose, including wood, soft tissue, macro and microscopic ecofactual material, and ancient molecules including DNA.

    “The archaeological and palaeoecological value of wetlands and ditches (a cultural ecosystem service in its own right) often comes primarily through anoxic conditions allowing for the survival of materials that in drier contexts would decompose; e.g., wood or soft tissue as well as macro and microscopic ecofactual (i.e., organic without human workmanship, yet culturally relevant) material 61 , and”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [62]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [14]14. Abelson PH. 1954. Amino acids in fossils. Science 119(3096):576
  2. [21]21. Bergmann W. 1963. In Organic Geochemistry , ed. IA Breger, p. 505. Oxford, UK: Pergamon
  3. [26]26. Summons RE, Powell TG, Boreham CJ. 1988. Petroleum geology and geochemistry of the Middle ProterozoicMcArthurBasin,NorthernAustralia:III.Compositionofextractablehydrocarbons. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 52(7):1747-63
  4. [30]30. Tito RY, Knights D, Metcalf J, Obregon-Tito AJ, Cleeland L, et al. 2012. Insights from characterizing extinct human gut microbiomes. PLOS ONE 7(12):e51146
  5. [31]31. Wales N, Allaby R, Willerslev E, Gilbert MTP. 2013. Ancient plant DNA. In Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science , ed. SA Elias, CJ Mock, pp. 705-15. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 2nd ed.
  6. [62]62. Correa-AscencioM,EvershedRP.2014.Highthroughputscreeningoforganicresiduesinarchaeological potsherds using direct acidified methanol extraction. Anal. Methods 6(5):1330
  7. [100]100. Fornelli L, Durbin KR, Fellers RT, Early BP, Greer JB, et al. 2017. Advancing top-down analysis of the humanproteomeusingabenchtopquadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer. J. Proteome Res. 16(2):609-18
  8. [113]113. Welker F. 2018. Elucidation of cross-species proteomic effects in human and hominin bone proteome identification through a bioinformatics experiment. BMC Evol. Bio. 18(23):1-11
  9. [122]122. MatthewsDE,HayesJM.1978.Isotope-ratio-monitoringgaschromatography-massspectrometry. Anal. Chem. 50(11):1465-73 <!-- image -->

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cappellini, E., Prohaska, A., Racimo, F., Welker, F., Pedersen, M. W., Allentoft, M. E., de Barros Damgaard, P., Gutenbrunner, P., Dunne, J., Hammann, S., Roffet-Salque, M., Ilardo, M., Moreno-Mayar, J. V., Wang, Y., Sikora, M., Vinner, L., Cox, J., Evershed, R. P., & Willerslev, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark;,
  • Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (DE)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Organic Geochemistry Unit, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, United Kingdom;
Venue
Annual Review of Biochemistry
Published
2018-06-20
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
1029-1060
ISSN
  • 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4509
OpenAlex
W2802156024
Cited by
118
References
173
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Biochemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Villum Fonden (KU2016, 00010120, 17649, 00017649)
  • Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2016-235, RPG-2016-115)
  • University of Cambridge
  • European Commission (324202, HORIZON2020, 722606)
  • National Research Foundation
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
  • Lundbeckfonden (R109-2012-9995, R70-2010-6286, KU2016, R155-2013-16338, R38-2008-3048, R24-2008-2527)
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • Natural Environment Research Council (lsmsf010001, NE/N011317/1)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (324202, FP7-IDEAS-ERC/324202)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Paleopathology and ancient diseases
Keywords
ancient biomolecules, ancient DNA, ancient proteins, biomolecule preservation, evolutionary inference, paleogenomics, palaeoproteomics, sample selection, analytical methods, computational methods
MeSH terms
DNA, Ancient, Animals, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Humans, Lipids, Paleontology, Phylogeny, Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Genomics, Proteomics, Extinction, Biological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review