Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Liquid extraction surface analysis mass spectrometry (LESA‐MS) as a novel profiling tool for drug distribution and metabolism analysis: the terfenadine example

Eikel, Daniel, Vavrek, Marissa, Smith, Sheri, Bason, Carol, Yeh, Suzie, Korfmacher, Walter A., Henion, Jack D.·2011·Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

Liquid extraction surface analysis mass spectrometry (LESA‐MS) is a novel surface profiling technique that combines micro‐liquid extraction from a solid surface with nano‐electrospray mass spectrometry. One potential application is the examination of the distribution of drugs and their metabolites by analyzing ex vivo tissue sections, an area where quantitative whole body autoradiography (QWBA) is traditionally employed. However, QWBA relies on the use of radiolabeled drugs and is limited to total radioactivity measured whereas LESA‐MS can provide drug‐ and metabolite‐specific distribution information. Here, we evaluate LESA‐MS, examining the distribution and biotransformation of unlabeled terfenadine in mice and compare our findings to QWBA, whole tissue LC/MS/MS and MALDI‐MSI. The spatial resolution of LESA‐MS can be optimized to ca. 1 mm on tissues such as brain, liver and kidney, also enabling drug profiling within a single organ. LESA‐MS can readily identify the biotransformation of terfenadine to its major, active metabolite fexofenadine. Relative quantification can confirm the rapid absorption of terfendine after oral dosage, its extensive first pass metabolism and the distribution of both compounds into systemic tissues such as muscle, spleen and kidney. The elimination appears to be consistent with biliary excretion and only trace levels of fexofenadine could be confirmed in brain. We found LESA‐MS to be more informative in terms of drug distribution than a comparable MALDI‐MS imaging study, likely due to its favorable overall sensitivity due to the larger surface area sampled. LESA‐MS appears to be a useful new profiling tool for examining the distribution of drugs and their metabolites in tissue sections. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rcm.5274

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Eikel, D., Vavrek, M., Smith, S., Bason, C., Yeh, S., Korfmacher, W. A., & Henion, J. D.
Venue
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-16
Volume
25
Issue
23
Pages
3587-3596
ISSN
  • 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0231
OpenAlex
W1554674919
Cited by
170
References
1
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liquid extraction surface analysis mass spectrometry (LESA‐MS) as a novel profiling tool for drug distribution and metabolism analysis: the terfenadine example. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rcm.5274
The paper
Eikel, D., Vavrek, M., Smith, S., Bason, C., Yeh, S., Korfmacher, W. A., & Henion, J. D. (2011). Liquid extraction surface analysis mass spectrometry (LESA‐MS) as a novel profiling tool for drug distribution and metabolism analysis: the terfenadine example. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.5274

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.