Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The apparent paradox of maternal seropositivity as a risk factor for congenital cytomegalovirus infection: a population‐based prediction model

de Vries, Jutte J. C., van Zwet, Erik W., Dekker, Friedo W., Kroes, Aloys C. M., Verkerk, Paul H., Vossen, Ann C. T. M.·2013·Reviews in Medical Virology

Abstract

SUMMARY: Because maternal seropositivity for CMV is associated with substantial protection against congenital CMV infection, prevention measures have focused mainly on seronegative pregnant women for decades. However, population‐wide insight in the contribution of nonprimary infection (reactivation and/or re‐infection with a different strain) on the most common sequela, hearing loss, is missing. A population‐based prediction model was developed to estimate the proportion of congenital CMV‐related hearing loss resulting from nonprimary maternal infection. Incorporated was a meta‐analysis of the risk of hearing loss, calculating pooled proportions of children with hearing loss after nonprimary and primary infection. Subsequently, the model was applied for worldwide present population seroprevalences (range 30–95%). It was estimated that, for all population seroprevalences, nonprimary maternal infections are responsible for the majority of congenital CMV infections. This proportion increased with seroprevalence, ranging from 57% (95%CI 24–85%) to 96% (95% CI 88–99%) for seroprevalences of 30% to 95%. Our meta‐analysis (six reports) showed that the risk of hearing loss after nonprimary infection was 11% (28/253 children, 95% CI 7–15%) versus 13% (50/385 children, 95% CI 10–16%) after primary infection. Incorporating this risk into our model, we estimated that nonprimary infections also accounted for the majority of CMV‐related hearing loss. This proportion ranged from 53% (95% CI 13–86%) to 95% (95% CI 62–99%) for seroprevalences of 30% to 95%. Our data underline the worldwide contribution of nonprimary infections in causing CMV‐related hearing loss. These results imply that prevention research such as vaccine and hygiene studies should not only be directed at seronegative but also seropositive pregnant women. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rmv.1744

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
de Vries, J. J. C., van Zwet, E. W., Dekker, F. W., Kroes, A. C. M., Verkerk, P. H., & Vossen, A. C. T. M.
Venue
Reviews in Medical Virology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-05
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
241-249
ISSN
  • 1052-9276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1654
OpenAlex
W2131924520
Cited by
195
References
1
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.