The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus control for a class of networks of dynamic agents
Abstract
In this paper, the consensus problems for networks of dynamic agents are investigated. The agent dynamics is adopted as a typical point mass model based on the Newton's law. The average‐consensus problem is proposed for such class of networks, which includes two aspects, the agreement of the states of the agents and the convergence to zero of the speeds of the agents. A linear consensus protocol for such networks is established for solving such a consensus problem that includes two parts, a local speed feedback controller and the interactions from the finite neighbours. Two kinds of topology are discussed: one is fixed topology, the other is switching one. The convergence analysis is proved and the protocol performance is discussed as well. The simulation results are presented that are consistent with our theoretical results. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788
Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Biggs, N. (1974) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511608704 · Cited by 2,940
Consensus protocols for networks of dynamic agents
Saber, R. O., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003. · doi:10.1109/acc.2003.1239709 · Cited by 901
Cited by
Xiao, F., & Wang, L. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2008.929381 · Cited by 734
Self-citationHou, Z.-G., Cheng, L., & Tan, M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2008.2007810 · Cited by 668
Li, Z., Ren, W., Liu, X., & Fu, M. (2013) · International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · doi:10.1002/rnc.1847 · Cited by 517
Robust consensus tracking of a class of second-order multi-agent dynamic systems
Hu, G. (2012) · Systems & Control Letters · doi:10.1016/j.sysconle.2011.10.004 · Cited by 339
Synchronization of coupled harmonic oscillators with local interaction
Ren, W. (2008) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2008.05.027 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, G., & Wang, L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-27
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10-11
- Pages
- 941-959
- ISSN
- 1049-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1239
- OpenAlex
- W2149559996
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 28.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus control for a class of networks of dynamic agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rnc.1144
- The paper
- Xie, G., & Wang, L. (2007). Consensus control for a class of networks of dynamic agents. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control. https://doi.org/10.1002/rnc.1144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
