Digital twin‐assisted fault diagnosis system for robot joints with insufficient data
Abstract
The robot joint is an important component of the construction robot, and its fault diagnosis can ensure the exact execution of building jobs, stable operation, and timely prevention of probable safety mishaps. However, deep learning‐based fault diagnosis needs a multitude of measured fault data, which is difficult to obtain for various reasons. To solve the problem of insufficient data, a digital twin‐assisted fault diagnosis system for robot joints is proposed. First, a simplified dynamics model of the robot joint is developed to generate the virtual entity data which can be used as the X‐domain data for the digital twin model. Second, a CycleGAN‐based digital twin model is proposed to map the virtual entity (X‐domain) data to the physical entity (Y‐domain) utilizing only a small amount of measured data. In the end, a test‐rig for the robot joint is built to simulate the robot's working conditions, and the CNN‐ResNet classifier is utilized to verify the effectiveness of the simulated data generated by the digital twin model. The results show that the fault diagnosis accuracy can be increased from 32.5% to 98.86% utilizing only 400 sets of measured data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FT-NCBFs ensure diagnostic accuracy in surgery.
“In surgery, fail-safe operation is critical to prevent harm, with FT-NCBFs ensuring diagnostic accuracy [49].”
From Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Control in Cooperative Robotics: Advances in Resilience and Scalability (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
Cites
Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art
Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2873186 · Cited by 4,391 · see citing works
Digital twin driven prognostics and health management for complex equipment
Tao, F., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2018) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.055 · Cited by 1,000 · see citing works
Product lifecycle management: the new paradigm for enterprises
Grieves, M. W. (2005) · International Journal of Product Development · doi:10.1504/ijpd.2005.006669 · Cited by 741 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Control in Cooperative Robotics: Advances in Resilience and Scalability
Urrea, C. (2025) · Actuators · doi:10.3390/act14040177 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Fault-Tolerant Neural Control Barrier Functions (FT-NCBFs) with a three-layer safety network further ensure diagnostic accuracy, supporting underwater resilience [49].”
- Authors
- Song, Z., Shi, H., Bai, X., & Li, G.
- Affiliations
- Shenyang Jianzhu University (CN)
- Shenyang Sanyo Heavy Industry Group Shenyang Sanyo Building Machinery Co., Ltd. Shenyang China
- Corresponding author
- Shi, Huaitao
- Venue
- Journal of Field Robotics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-10-17
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 258-271
- ISSN
- 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-4967
- OpenAlex
- W4306407044
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Field Robotics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Keywords
- digital twin, fault diagnosis, robot joints, construction robotics, limited training data, CycleGAN, data augmentation, simulation data generation, test bench
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review