Cited by 741Product Development and CustomizationERP Systems Implementation and ImpactSystems Engineering Methodologies and Applications

Product lifecycle management: the new paradigm for enterprises

Grieves, Michael W.·2005·International Journal of Product Development

Abstract

Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) is a developing paradigm. One way to develop an understanding of PLM's characteristic and boundaries is to propose models that help us conceptualise both holistic and component views in compact packages. Models can give us both a rich way of thinking about overall concepts and can identify areas where we need to explore issues that such models raise. In this paper, the author proposes and discusses two such related models, the Product Lifecycle Management Model (PLM Model) and the Mirrored Spaces Model (MSM) and investigates the conceptual and technical issues raised by these models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1504/ijpd.2005.006669

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2002, Michael Grieves introduced a three-component model related to Product Lifecycle Management for manufacturing, initially called the Mirrored Spaces Model.

    “In 2002, Michael Grieves, a professor at the University of Michigan, provided a conceptual description by introducing a three-component model related to Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems for manufacturing and was initially referred to as the”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grieves, M. W.
Corresponding author
Grieves, Michael W.
Venue
International Journal of Product Development
Published
2005
Volume
2
Issue
1/2
Pages
71
ISSN
  • 1477-9056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-8178
OpenAlex
W2047355416
Cited by
741
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 96 · 2025: 140 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Product Development (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Product Development and Customization
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Keywords
product lifecycle management, conceptual model, product development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review