CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Framing the concept of satellite remote sensing essential biodiversity variables: challenges and future directions

Pettorelli, Nathalie, Wegmann, Martin, Skidmore, Andrew, Mücher, Sander, Dawson, Terence P., Fernandez, Miguel, Lucas, Richard, Schaepman, Michael E., Wang, Tiejun, O'Connor, Brian, Jongman, Robert H.G., Kempeneers, Pieter, Sonnenschein, Ruth, Leidner, Allison K., Böhm, Monika, He, Kate S., Nagendra, Harini, Dubois, Grégoire, Fatoyinbo, Temilola, Hansen, Matthew C., Paganini, Marc, de Klerk, Helen M., Asner, Gregory P., Kerr, Jeremy T., Estes, Anna B., Schmeller, Dirk S., Heiden, Uta, Rocchini, Duccio, Pereira, Henrique M., Turak, Eren, Fernandez, Nestor, Lausch, Angela, Cho, Moses A., Alcaraz‐Segura, Domingo, McGeoch, Mélodie A., Turner, Woody, Mueller, Andreas, St‐Louis, Véronique, Penner, Johannes, Vihervaara, Petteri, Belward, Alan, Reyers, Belinda, Geller, Gary N.·2016·Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
DOI 10.1002/rse2.15
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Although satellite‐based variables have for long been expected to be key components to a unified and global biodiversity monitoring strategy, a definitive and agreed list of these variables still remains elusive. The growth of interest in biodiversity variables observable from space has been partly underpinned by the development of the essential biodiversity variable (EBV) framework by the Group on Earth Observations – Biodiversity Observation Network, which itself was guided by the process of identifying essential climate variables. This contribution aims to advance the development of a global biodiversity monitoring strategy by updating the previously published definition of EBV, providing a definition of satellite remote sensing (SRS) EBV s and introducing a set of principles that are believed to be necessary if ecologists and space agencies are to agree on a list of EBV s that can be routinely monitored from space. Progress toward the identification of SRS‐EBV s will require a clear understanding of what makes a biodiversity variable essential, as well as agreement on who the users of the SRS‐EBV s are. Technological and algorithmic developments are rapidly expanding the set of opportunities for SRS in monitoring biodiversity, and so the list of SRS‐EBV s is likely to evolve over time. This means that a clear and common platform for data providers, ecologists, environmental managers, policy makers and remote sensing experts to interact and share ideas needs to be identified to support long‐term coordinated actions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rse2.15

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change

    Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1244693 · Cited by 11,704

    Self-citation

  • Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity

    Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11148 · Cited by 7,457 · cited 2×

    “At the same time, evidence on the role of biodiversity in supporting the functioning of ecosystems, economies and human health continues to mount (Cardinale et al. 2012); the recent decline in pollinators and its potential impact on food production being a key example of this issue (Klein et al.…”
    Background

  • Defaunation in the Anthropocene

    Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Galetti, M., Ceballos, G., Isaac, N. J. B., & Collen, B. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1251817 · Cited by 4,474 · cited 1×

    “For example, it has been recently estimated that out of the conservatively estimated 5–9 million animal species inhabiting the planet, ~11,000–58,000 species are lost annually (Dirzo et al. 2014).”
    Background

  • A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets

    Tittensor, D. P., Walpole, M., Hill, S. L. L., Boyce, D. G., Britten, G. L., Burgess, N. D., Butchart, S. H. M., Leadley, P. W., Regan, E. C., Alkemade, R., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1257484 · Cited by 1,227

    Self-citation

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.017 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.rse.2012.12.027 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.03.009 · DOI
  4. 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00047.1 · DOI
  5. 10.1098/rstb.2004.1583 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/2041-210X.12301 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.09.002 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/acv.12094 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.030 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0924-2716(91)90003-E · DOI
  12. 10.1080/01431161.2012.712224 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.015 · DOI
  14. 10.1371/annotation/32c246eb‐3b73‐4410‐a44c‐b41ddae11fc5 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/TGRS.2008.919761 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.12.002 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.024 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jag.2014.11.011 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.rse.2007.11.013 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.06.003 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.003 · DOI
  22. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721 · DOI
  23. 10.3390/rs4123766 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.016 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01044.x · DOI
  26. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0194 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s00267-008-9187-2 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x · DOI
  29. 10.1002/rse2.4 · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.1229931 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199693160.001.0001 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/rse2.1 · DOI
  33. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0190 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/2484227 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.010 · DOI
  36. 10.1098/rstb.2014.0003 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00523.x · DOI
  38. 10.1029/2011JG001708 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/523403a · DOI
  40. 10.1017/S003060531100024X · DOI
  41. 10.1126/science.1259855 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1073/pnas.0409902102 · DOI
  43. Visconti P. M.Bakkeness D.Baisero T.Brooks S. H. M.Butchart L.Joppa et al.2015.Projecting Global Biodiversity Indicators under Future Development Scenarios. Conservation Letters in press · DOI
  44. 10.3390/rs71114781 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Pettorelli, N., Wegmann, M., Skidmore, A., Mücher, S., Dawson, T. P., Fernandez, M., Lucas, R., Schaepman, M. E., Wang, T., O'Connor, B., Jongman, R. H. G., Kempeneers, P., Sonnenschein, R., Leidner, A. K., Böhm, M., He, K. S., Nagendra, H., Dubois, G., Fatoyinbo, T., Hansen, M. C., Paganini, M., de Klerk, H. M., Asner, G. P., Kerr, J. T., Estes, A. B., Schmeller, D. S., Heiden, U., Rocchini, D., Pereira, H. M., Turak, E., Fernandez, N., Lausch, A., Cho, M. A., Alcaraz‐Segura, D., McGeoch, M. A., Turner, W., Mueller, A., St‐Louis, V., Penner, J., Vihervaara, P., Belward, A., Reyers, B., & Geller, G. N.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Zoology Zoological Society of London Regent's Park London NW1 4RY United Kingdom
  • Department of Remote Sensing University of Wuerzburg Wurzburg 97074 Germany
  • Department of Natural Resources Faculty of Geo‐Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) University of Twente P.O. Box 217 AE Enschede 7500 The Netherlands
  • Alterra Wageningen UR Droevendaalsesteeg 3 Wageningen 6708 PB The Netherlands
  • Centre for Environmental Change and Human Resilience University of Dundee Dundee DD1 4HN United Kingdom
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Deutscher Platz 5e Leipzig 04103 Germany
  • Centre for Ecosystem Science (CES) School of Biological Earth and Environmental Science (BEES) The University of New South Wales (UNSW) High Street Kensington New South Wales 2052 Australia
  • Remote Sensing Laboratories University of Zurich Winterthurerstrasse 190 Zurich CH–8057 Switzerland
  • United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP‐WCMC) 219 Huntingdon Road Cambridge CB3 0DL United Kingdom
  • European Commission ‐ Joint Research Centre Via E. Fermi 2749 Ispra Varese 21027 Italy
  • Institute for Applied Remote Sensing European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano (EURAC) Viale Druso 1 Bozen/Bolzano 39100 Italy
  • Universities Space Research Association NASA Earth Science Division 300 E St SW Washington DC 20546
  • Department of Biological Sciences Murray State University Murray Kentucky 42071
  • School of Development Azim Premji University Hosur Road, Electronic City Bangalore 560100 India
  • Biospheric Sciences Laboratory NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 8800 Greenbelt Road Greenbelt Maryland 20771
  • University of Maryland 4321 Hartwick Road Suite 400 College Park Maryland 20740
  • European Space Agency ESRIN Via Galileo Galilei Frascati 00044 Italy
  • Department of Geography and Environmental Studies Stellenbosch University Chamber of Mines Building c/o Merriman & van Ryneveld Street Stellenbosch South Africa
  • Department of Global Ecology Carnegie Institution for Science 260 Panama St. Stanford California 94305
  • Department of Biology University of Ottawa Ottawa ON K1N 6N5 Canada
  • The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania 16802
  • Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research‐UFZ Permoserstrasse 15 Leipzig 04318 Germany
  • German Remote Sensing Data Centre German Aerospace Centre DLR Wessling 82234 Germany
  • Fondazione Edmund Mach Research and Innovation Centre Department of Biodiversity and Molecular Ecology Via E. Mach 1 S. Michele all'Adige (TN) 38010 Italy
  • NSW Office of Environment and Heritage PO Box A290 Sydney South New South Wales 1232 Australia
  • Earth Observation group Natural Resources and Environment Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Building 33 CSIR Pretoria, P.O. Box 395 Pretoria South Africa
  • Department of Botany Facultad de Ciencias Planta 6 Sección de Biología Campus Universitario de Fuentenueva Universidad de Granada Granada 18071 Spain
  • School of Biological Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria 3800 Australia
  • Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters Washington DC 20546
  • Wildlife Biometrics Unit Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 5463‐C West Broadway Ave Forest Lake Minnesota 55025
  • Museum für Naturkunde Berlin ‐ Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science Invalidenstrasse 43 Berlin 10115 Germany
  • Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) Natural Environment Centre P.O. Box 140, Mechelininkatu 34a Helsinki FI‐00251 Finland
  • Stockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University 10691 Sweden
  • Group on Earth Observations 7 bis avenue de la Paix, Case postale 2300 Geneva 2 Switzerland
ORCID
Dubois, Grégoire
Venue
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-25
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
122-131
ISSN
2056-3485
DOI
10.1002/rse2.15
Cited by
295
References
4
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
European Union (308454)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review