The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology‐enhanced inquiry tools in science education: An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice
Abstract
Researchers and practitioners have attempted to identify technologies that support students' scientific understanding, activities and support practices that facilitate students' inquiry processes, and methods to sustain technology‐enhanced innovations in everyday science classrooms. The purpose of this paper is to examine the findings and implications of research on science inquiry tools on classroom teaching and learning practices. We summarize research on inquiry tools and present a framework for teaching and learning in technology‐enhanced, inquiry‐based science classes. In the framework, three dimensions are discussed: the macrocontext (systemic reform and educational standards), the teachers' community (physical or virtual context, where teachers share expertise and mentor each other), and the microcontext (classroom context, where learning and teaching occur). From this pedagogical framework, the interactions among the standards, teachers' community, and classroom contexts are key to exploring the role of technologies. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Sci Ed,91:1010–1030, 2007
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
BRUNER, J. S. (1960) · doi:10.4159/9780674028999 · Cited by 6,042
What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038004915 · Cited by 5,047
Toward a design theory of problem solving
Jonassen, D. H. (2000) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02300500 · Cited by 2,114
Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2 · Cited by 1,394
Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies
SALOMON, G., PERKINS, D. N., & GLOBERSON, T. (1991) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x020003002 · Cited by 948
Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning
Chan, K.-W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.09.002 · Cited by 640
Beyond Amplification: Using the computer to Reorganize Mental Functioning
Pea, R. D. (1985) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2004_2 · Cited by 556
Addressing the challenges of inquiry‐based learning through technology and curriculum design
Edelson, D., Gordin, D., & Pea, R. (1999) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0803&4_3 · Cited by 366
Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543075003285 · Cited by 273
Cited by
Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.024 · Cited by 484
Self-citationMamun, M. A. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103695 · Cited by 283
Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20463 · Cited by 265
Using Peer Feedback to Improve Students’ Scientific Inquiry
Tasker, T. Q., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2016) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-016-9454-7 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J., & Bryan, L. A.
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06-25
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1010-1030
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W1984531001
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 34.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technology‐enhanced inquiry tools in science education: An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sce.20219
- The paper
- Kim, M. C., Hannafin, M. J., & Bryan, L. A. (2007). Technology‐enhanced inquiry tools in science education: An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.