Cited by 273Library Science and Information LiteracyEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

The Web as an Information Resource in K–12 Education: Strategies for Supporting Students in Searching and Processing Information

Open access
Kuiper, Els, Volman, Monique, Terwel, Jan·2005·Review of Educational Research

Abstract

The use of the Web in K–12 education has increased substantially in recent years. The Web, however, does not support the learning processes of students as a matter of course. In this review, the authors analyze what research says about the demands that the use of the Web as an information resource in education makes on the support and supervision of students’ learning processes. They discuss empirical research focusing on the limitations of the actual search strategies of children, as well as theoretical literature that analyzes specific characteristics of the Web and their implications for the organization of education. The authors conclude that students need support in searching on the Web as well as in developing “information literacy.” Future research should focus on how the use of the Web in education can contribute to the development of deep and meaningful knowledge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/00346543075003285

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a dearth of rigorous research pairing media literacy education with outcomes.

    “A difficulty in answering these questions is the dearth of rigorous research pairing media literacy education with outcomes (Buckingham, 2003; Kuiper, Volman, Terwel, 2005; Lemish, 2015).”

    From The Promises, Challenges, and Futures of Media Literacy (2018) · cites this paper as Kuiper, Volman, Terwel, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Review of Educational Research
Published
2005-09
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
285-328
ISSN
  • 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1046
OpenAlex
W2158616698
Cited by
273
References
71
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 25
FWCI
41.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
World Wide Web in education, K-12 education, information literacy, children's information seeking, student supervision, information processing, deep learning, meaningful knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review