The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science
Abstract
Recent calls for teacher preparation to become more grounded in practice prompt the questions: Which practices? and perhaps more fundamentally, what counts as a model of instruction worth learning for a new professional—i.e., the beginner's repertoire? In this report, we argue the following: If a defined set of subject‐specific high‐leverage practices could be articulated and taught during teacher preparation and induction, the broader teacher education community could collectively refine these practices as well as the tools and other resources that support their appropriation by novices across various learning‐to‐teach contexts. To anchor our conversation about these issues, we describe the evolution, in design, and enactment, of a “candidate core” and a suite of tools that supported the approximation of equitable and rigorous pedagogy for several groups of beginning science teachers. Their struggles and successes in taking up ambitious practice informed not only our designs for a beginner's repertoire but also a system of tools and socioprofessional routines that could foster such teaching over time. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 96:878–903, 2012
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
(1999) · Cited by 12,812
National Science Education Standards
Shea, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Geological Education · doi:10.5408/0022-1368-43.2.102 · Cited by 7,888
Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x · Cited by 4,501
Voices of the Mind: Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action
Wertsch, J. V. (1993) · doi:10.4159/9780674045101 · Cited by 4,099
Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning
Cazden, C. B. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,045
Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312042002371 · Cited by 2,812
(1997) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 2,510
Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3327 · Cited by 2,480
The Impact of Individual Teachers on Student Achievement: Evidence from Panel Data
Rockoff, J. E. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828041302244 · Cited by 2,432
Cited by
Benedict-Chambers, A., Kademian, S. M., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2017) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1366674 · Cited by 68
Watkins, J., & Manz, E. (2022) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21747 · Cited by 56
Daniel, S. M., & Pray, L. (2017) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.347 · Cited by 38
Supporting Beginning Teacher Planning of Investigation-Based Science Discussions
Kademian, S. M., & Davis, E. A. (2018) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/1046560x.2018.1504266 · Cited by 29
Klette, K., Hammerness, K., & Jenset, I. S. (2017) · Acta Didactica Norge · doi:10.5617/adno.4730 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D.
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-09
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 878-903
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2047239696
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 93
- FWCI
- 92.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sce.21027
- The paper
- Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.