The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The roles of social influences on student competence, relatedness, achievement, and retention in STEM
Abstract
Students’ perceptions of competence and relatedness are known to influence learning processes and achievement, and may have particular import for underrepresented science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) learners. Sources of social support that contribute to undergraduate life science learners’ perceived competence and relatedness were examined, as were achievement and retention outcomes influenced by these sources of support and self‐determination theory components. Female, ethnically underrepresented, or first‐generation students reported similar levels of perceived competence and relatedness in STEM compared to their majority counterparts at a large, urban university. However, social supports, competence, and relatedness were differentially important for these subgroups as predictors of achievement and intention to leave a science major. For the full sample, competence perceptions predicted greater achievement and lessened intentions to leave a major. Competence perceptions were primarily derived from contact with classmates, especially for underrepresented groups. Feelings of relatedness were specifically important for the retention of women pursuing science degrees. Contacts with STEM peers and classmates were sources of relatedness for majority groups, but classmate contact was not significant for underrepresented groups. Findings highlight the value of promoting competence and relatedness and the differing sources that these subgroups draw on to build th…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Even though relatedness remains a positive factor in explaining types of self-determined motivation, it seems that feelings of belongingness and meaningful connections at school may not be as important for student motivation as it could be for other facets of the student experience (e.g., intention to leave the program; Hilts et al., 2018).”
From Pathways to Student Motivation: A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents of Autonomous and Controlled Motivations (2022) · cites this paper as Hilts et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084
Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning
Bandura, A. (1993) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3 · Cited by 7,655
Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008) · Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/a0012801 · Cited by 6,664
Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317909x481382 · Cited by 1,305
Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics.
Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026659 · Cited by 1,113
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021385 · Cited by 1,050
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- American Council on Education, 1987, The student personnel point of view, 1949: Points of view, 17
- 10.1002/sce.21319 · DOI
- Bandura A., 2006, Self‐efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 307
- 10.1002/sce.21095 · DOI
- 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
- 10.1080/09500693.2016.1143137 · DOI
- 10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0006 · DOI
- Dentlinger N., 2003, Academic Self‐efficacy, prior academic success, demographic variables, and academic success in first semester associate degree nursing coursework
- 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148 · DOI
- 10.1002/sce.21323 · DOI
- 10.1002/sce.21330 · DOI
- 10.2307/749515 · DOI · Paper page
- Hill C., 2010, Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
- 10.1080/09500693.2016.1229074 · DOI
- 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2012.00026.x · DOI
- 10.1353/mpq.0.0001 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF03173432 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.84 · DOI · Paper page
- Malicky D.(2003).A literature review on the underrepresentation of women in undergraduate engineering: Ability self‐efficacy and the “chilly climate”. Paper presented at 2003 annual conference Nashville Tennessee. Retrieved fromhttps://peer.asee.org/11918 · DOI
- 10.1002/sce.21305 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.341 · DOI
- National Science Board, 2015, Revisiting the STEM workforce: A companion to science and engineering indicators 2014
- 10.1037/0022-0167.45.4.483 · DOI
- 10.3200/JEXE.76.2.170-190 · DOI
- 10.1177/1477878509104318 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0034027 · DOI
- Redford J., 2017, First‐generation and continuing‐generation college students: A comparison of high school and postsecondary experiences. Stats in brief (NCES 2018‐009)
- Robnett R.(2013).The role of peer support for girls and women in the stem pipeline: Promoting identification with stem and mitigating the negative effects of sexism(Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Document ID no. 1430500640).
- 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · DOI · Paper page
- Ryan R. M., 2008, Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 654
- 10.1080/09500693.2017.1341067 · DOI
- Schunk D. H., 2006, Self‐efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 71
- 10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09500693.2017.1387946 · DOI
- Simon R. A., 2015, Exploring student persistence in STEM programs: A motivational model, Canadian Journal of Education, 38, 1
- 10.1002/tea.21123 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10755-014-9300-9 · DOI
- U.S. Department of Education, 2016, Asian american and native american pacific islander‐serving institution program
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mishra, S. (2020) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100307 · Cited by 688
Bureau, J. S., Howard, J. L., Chong, J. X. Y., & Guay, F. (2022) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543211042426 · Cited by 414
“Even though relatedness remains a positive factor in explaining types of self-determined motivation, it seems that feelings of belongingness and meaningful connections at school may not be as important for student motivation as it could be for other facets of the student experience (e.g., intention to leave the progra…”
BackgroundLaDue, N. D., Zocher, E., & Dugas, D. (2024) · Journal for STEM Education Research · doi:10.1007/s41979-024-00116-1 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Hilts, A., Part, R., & Bernacki, M. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Part, Rachel
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-05-20
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 744-770
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2804780122
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 10.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science Education (publishedVersion)
- Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Keywords
- perceived competence, relatedness, social support, student retention, STEM achievement, underrepresented students, first-generation college students, women in science, self-determination theory, peer support, undergraduate science students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review