Cited by 91Career Development and DiversityEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessHigher Education Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The roles of social influences on student competence, relatedness, achievement, and retention in STEM

Abstract

Students’ perceptions of competence and relatedness are known to influence learning processes and achievement, and may have particular import for underrepresented science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) learners. Sources of social support that contribute to undergraduate life science learners’ perceived competence and relatedness were examined, as were achievement and retention outcomes influenced by these sources of support and self‐determination theory components. Female, ethnically underrepresented, or first‐generation students reported similar levels of perceived competence and relatedness in STEM compared to their majority counterparts at a large, urban university. However, social supports, competence, and relatedness were differentially important for these subgroups as predictors of achievement and intention to leave a science major. For the full sample, competence perceptions predicted greater achievement and lessened intentions to leave a major. Competence perceptions were primarily derived from contact with classmates, especially for underrepresented groups. Feelings of relatedness were specifically important for the retention of women pursuing science degrees. Contacts with STEM peers and classmates were sources of relatedness for majority groups, but classmate contact was not significant for underrepresented groups. Findings highlight the value of promoting competence and relatedness and the differing sources that these subgroups draw on to build th…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sce.21449

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. American Council on Education, 1987, The student personnel point of view, 1949: Points of view, 17
  2. 10.1002/sce.21319 · DOI
  3. Bandura A., 2006, Self‐efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 307
  4. 10.1002/sce.21095 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/09500693.2016.1143137 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0006 · DOI
  9. Dentlinger N., 2003, Academic Self‐efficacy, prior academic success, demographic variables, and academic success in first semester associate degree nursing coursework
  10. 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/sce.21323 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/sce.21330 · DOI
  13. 10.2307/749515 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hill C., 2010, Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
  15. 10.1080/09500693.2016.1229074 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2012.00026.x · DOI
  17. 10.1353/mpq.0.0001 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/BF03173432 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.84 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Malicky D.(2003).A literature review on the underrepresentation of women in undergraduate engineering: Ability self‐efficacy and the “chilly climate”. Paper presented at 2003 annual conference Nashville Tennessee. Retrieved fromhttps://peer.asee.org/11918 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/sce.21305 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.341 · DOI
  24. National Science Board, 2015, Revisiting the STEM workforce: A companion to science and engineering indicators 2014
  25. 10.1037/0022-0167.45.4.483 · DOI
  26. 10.3200/JEXE.76.2.170-190 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/1477878509104318 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1037/a0034027 · DOI
  29. Redford J., 2017, First‐generation and continuing‐generation college students: A comparison of high school and postsecondary experiences. Stats in brief (NCES 2018‐009)
  30. Robnett R.(2013).The role of peer support for girls and women in the stem pipeline: Promoting identification with stem and mitigating the negative effects of sexism(Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Document ID no. 1430500640).
  31. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Ryan R. M., 2008, Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 654
  33. 10.1080/09500693.2017.1341067 · DOI
  34. Schunk D. H., 2006, Self‐efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 71
  35. 10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1080/09500693.2017.1387946 · DOI
  37. Simon R. A., 2015, Exploring student persistence in STEM programs: A motivational model, Canadian Journal of Education, 38, 1
  38. 10.1002/tea.21123 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s10755-014-9300-9 · DOI
  40. U.S. Department of Education, 2016, Asian american and native american pacific islander‐serving institution program

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 91

Metadata

Authors
Hilts, A., Part, R., & Bernacki, M. L.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Part, Rachel
Venue
Science Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05-20
Volume
102
Issue
4
Pages
744-770
ISSN
  • 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-237X
OpenAlex
W2804780122
Cited by
91
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science Education (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
perceived competence, relatedness, social support, student retention, STEM achievement, underrepresented students, first-generation college students, women in science, self-determination theory, peer support, undergraduate science students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review