Cited by 501Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and DiversityScience Education and Perceptions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls' and women's performance and interest in STEM fields

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 61 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 501

Metadata

Authors
Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Shapiro, Jenessa R.
Venue
Sex Roles
Published
2011-07-31
Volume
66
Issue
3-4
Pages
175-183
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
OpenAlex
W2078433162
Cited by
501
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
13.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
Keywords
stereotype threat, gender stereotypes, student attitudes toward mathematics, women in STEM, STEM interest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review