The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does information and communication technology affect CO2 mitigation under the pathway of sustainable development during the mode of globalization?
Abstract
The rapid developments of globalization promote interaction among countries and people around the globe through the fast mode of information and telecommunication technology (ICT). ICT development also contributes to economic growth through various channels, but it may influence the environment on the other hand. Considering this concern, the present study focuses on examining the relationship between ICT developments and carbon emissions through the globalization channel. The study employs robust panel data estimation methods, continuously updated fully modified, and continuously updated bias corrected estimators, for the data set of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) economies spanning from 1990 to 2015. Findings of the study are robust against heteroskedasticity, endogeneity, and cross‐sectional dependence issues. The robust panel data estimators reveal that ICT has a favourable effect on carbon emissions in BRICS countries. Also, globalization leads to environmental pollution by contributing to an increase in CO 2 emissions. These findings provide new insights to the policymakers in combatting environmental challenges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Economic growth and the environment
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118443 · Cited by 9,901
Hsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
The Rebound Effect and Energy Efficiency Policy
Gillingham, K., Rapson, D., & Wagner, G. (2016) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/rev017 · Cited by 672
Information communication technology and electricity consumption in emerging economies
Sadorsky, P. (2012) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.064 · Cited by 355
ICT, CO 2 Emissions and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Panel of ASEAN
Lee, J. W., & Brahmasrene, T. (2014) · Global Economic Review · doi:10.1080/1226508x.2014.917803 · Cited by 330
Adebola Solarin, S., Al-Mulali, U., & Ozturk, I. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.028 · Cited by 229
Cited by
Umar, M., Ji, X., Kirikkaleli, D., Shahbaz, M., & Zhou, X. (2020) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2116 · Cited by 386
Ahmed, Z., & Le, H. P. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11205-0 · Cited by 326
Haldar, A., & Sethi, N. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111754 · Cited by 322
Ahmed, Z., Nathaniel, S. P., & Shahbaz, M. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125529 · Cited by 302
Erdoğan, S., Çakar, N. D., Ulucak, R., Danish, & Kassouri, Y. (2021) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2137 · Cited by 293
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ulucak, R., Danish, & Khan, S. U.
- Venue
- Sustainable Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-02-14
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 857-867
- ISSN
- 0968-0802 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1719
- OpenAlex
- W3006474622
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 34.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.