The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial intelligence ‐ driven sustainable development: Examining organizational, technical, and processing approaches to achieving global goals
Open accessAbstract
This study presents a comprehensive literature review using a systematic approach to explore the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in promoting sustainable development in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The systematic review approach was applied to collect and analyze topics, and the literature search was conducted in two stages, encompassing 57 articles that met the research requirements. Our analysis reveals that AI's contribution to sustainability is concentrated within three key areas: organizational, technical, and processing aspects. The organizational aspect focuses on the integration of AI in companies and industries, addressing barriers to implementation and the relationship between companies, partners, and customers. The technical aspect highlights the development of AI algorithms that can address global challenges and contribute to the growth of stability and development in society. The processing aspect emphasizes the internal transformation of companies, their business models, and strategies in response to AI integration. Our proposed conceptual model outlines the essential elements organizations must consider when incorporating AI into their sustainability efforts, such as strategic alignment, infrastructure development, change management, and continuous improvement. By addressing these critical aspects, organizations can harness the potential of AI to drive positive social, environmental, and economic outcomes, ultimately contributing to the achievement of the SDGs. The model serves as a comprehensive framework for organizations seeking to leverage AI for sustainable development, but it should be adapted to individual contexts to ensure its relevance and effectiveness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906 · Cited by 11,748
Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making
Jarrahi, M. H. (2018) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007 · Cited by 2,772
Mensah, J. (2019) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531 · Cited by 1,876
Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., & Martyn-St James, M. (2022) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036232009 · Cited by 1,172
The Place of Inter-Rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: An Empirical Study
Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J., & Marteau, T. (1997) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038597031003015 · Cited by 1,008
Crafting Brand Authenticity: The Case of Luxury Wines*
Beverland, M. B. (2005) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00530.x · Cited by 864
Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model
Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Baabdullah, A. M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120880 · Cited by 825
Artificial intelligence and sustainable development
Goralski, M. A., & Tan, T. K. (2020) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100330 · Cited by 750
Benzidia, S., Makaoui, N., & Bentahar, O. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120557 · Cited by 703
Cited by
AI and sustainable business model innovation: A systematic literature review
Sharma, A., Khokhar, M., Duan, Y., Bibi, M., Sharma, R., & Muhammad, B. (2025) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101204 · Cited by 19
Sustainability Education in L2 Writing: AI-Based Multimodal Awareness and Engagement
Aydın Yıldız, T. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17219376 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Kulkov, I., Kulkova, J., Rohrbeck, R., Menvielle, L., Kaartemo, V., & Makkonen, H.
- Venue
- Sustainable Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-10-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2253-2267
- ISSN
- 0968-0802 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1719
- OpenAlex
- W4387397415
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 36.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial intelligence ‐ driven sustainable development: Examining organizational, technical, and processing approaches to achieving global goals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sd.2773
- The paper
- Kulkov, I., Kulkova, J., Rohrbeck, R., Menvielle, L., Kaartemo, V., & Makkonen, H. (2024). Artificial intelligence ‐ driven sustainable development: Examining organizational, technical, and processing approaches to achieving global goals. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2773
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.