The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systems thinking: Critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond
Abstract
The problems we face at all levels in the world today resist unilateral solutions. While the web of interdependencies tightens, our capacity for thinking in terms of dynamic interdependencies has not kept pace. As the gap between the nature of our problems and the ability to understand them grows, we face increasing perils on a multitude of fronts. Systems thinking and one of its subsets‐system dynamics‐are important for developing effective strategies to close this gap. Unfortunately, system dynamicists and systems thinkers have not effectively taught their framework, skills, and technologies to others. The door has not been opened wide enough to let others share our insights with respect to the workings of closed‐loop systems. To transfer this understanding on a broad scale, we need a clearer view of its nature and of the education system into which it must be transferred. This article casts some light on what we have to bestow and on the education system that is to receive our bounty. Its intended audience is both system thinkers and educators, and the hope is to help eradicate the distinction between the two.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Problems with causal‐loop diagrams
Richardson, G. P. (1986) · System Dynamics Review · doi:10.1002/sdr.4260020207 · Cited by 284
Cited by
Learning in and about complex systems
Sterman, J. D. (1994) · System Dynamics Review · doi:10.1002/sdr.4260100214 · Cited by 1,279
Bathtub dynamics: initial results of a systems thinking inventory
Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2000) · System Dynamics Review · doi:10.1002/sdr.198 · Cited by 763
The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition?
Gürsan, C., & de Gooyert, V. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110552 · Cited by 364
Global water resources modeling with an integrated model of the social-economic-environmental system
Davies, E. G. R., & Simonovic, S. P. (2011) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.02.010 · Cited by 262
A complete set of systems thinking skills
Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2017) · Insight · doi:10.1002/inst.12159 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Richmond, B.
- Venue
- System Dynamics Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-133
- ISSN
- 0883-7066 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1727
- OpenAlex
- W2119092499
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systems thinking: Critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sdr.4260090203
- The paper
- Richmond, B. (1993). Systems thinking: Critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260090203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.