The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reproducible XPS on biopolymers: cellulose studies
Abstract
The development of ‘user‐friendly’ surface analytical instrumentation has expanded the application of x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) towards softer and more complex composite materials. However, the knowledge of fundamental phenomena in practical, interdisciplinary applications is dearly needed. In the case of polymers and polymer‐based or ‐reinforced composites, the analytical problems are not only related to detection limits and resolution; indeed, the effects of contamination and experimental artefacts on interpretation of the carbon signal are often the more crucial challenge. As a biopolymer, natural cellulose fibres provide an interesting model system for polymer studies. Numerous published XPS studies on lignocelluloses highlight both the possibilities and the problems of the surface analytical probes in analysis of air‐exposed organic materials. We report XPS experiments of cellulosic natural fibre materials, discussing the effects of sample storage, UHV exposure, radiation doses, charging and data analysis. Based on a large body of experimental data we also propose that clean paper specimens could be used as an in‐situ reference in polymer studies. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials
Foster, E. J., Moon, R. J., Agarwal, U. P., Bortner, M. J., Bras, J., Camarero-Espinosa, S., Chan, K. J., Clift, M. J. D., Cranston, E. D., Eichhorn, S. J., et al. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00895j · Cited by 1,021
Benchmarking Cellulose Nanocrystals: From the Laboratory to Industrial Production
Reid, M. S., Villalobos, M., & Cranston, E. D. (2017) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765 · Cited by 518
Zoppe, J. O., Habibi, Y., Rojas, O. J., Venditti, R. A., Johansson, L.-S., Efimenko, K., Österberg, M., & Laine, J. (2010) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm100719d · Cited by 283
Self-citationOrelma, H., Filpponen, I., Johansson, L.-S., Laine, J., & Rojas, O. J. (2011) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm201236a · Cited by 200
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Johansson, L., & Campbell, J. M.
- Venue
- Surface and Interface Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1018-1022
- ISSN
- 0142-2421 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9918
- OpenAlex
- W1990826350
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproducible XPS on biopolymers: cellulose studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sia.1827
- The paper
- Johansson, L., & Campbell, J. M. (2004). Reproducible XPS on biopolymers: cellulose studies. Surface and Interface Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.1827
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
