The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benchmarking Cellulose Nanocrystals: From the Laboratory to Industrial Production
Open accessAbstract
The renewability, biocompatibility, and mechanical properties of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) have made them an attractive material for numerous composite, biomedical, and rheological applications. However, for CNCs to shift from a laboratory curiosity to commercial applications, researchers must transition from CNCs extracted on the bench scale to material produced on an industrial scale. There are a number of companies currently producing kilogram to ton per day quantities of sulfuric acid-hydrolyzed CNCs as well as other nanocelluloses, as described herein. With the recent intensification of industrially produced CNCs and the variety of cellulose sources, hydrolysis methods, and purification procedures, the characterization of these materials becomes critical. This has further been justified by the past two decades of research that demonstrate that the CNC stability and behavior are highly dependent on the surface chemistry, surface charge density, and particle size. This work outlines key test methods that should be employed to characterize these properties to ensure a "known" starting material and consistent performance. Of the sulfuric acid-extracted CNCs examined, industrially produced material compared well with laboratory-made CNCs, exhibiting similar charge density, colloidal and thermal stability, crystallinity, morphology, and self-assembly behavior. In addition, it was observed that further purification of CNCs using Soxhlet extraction in ethanol had minimal impact on the nanoparticle properties and is unlikely to be necessary for many applications. Overall, the current standing of industrially produced CNCs is positive, suggesting that the evolution to commercial-scale applications will not be hindered by CNC production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chitin and chitosan: Properties and applications
Rinaudo, M. (2006) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.001 · Cited by 8,259
Cellulose: Fascinating Biopolymer and Sustainable Raw Material
Klemm, D., Heublein, B., Fink, H., & Bohn, A. (2005) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200460587 · Cited by 7,551
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
DLS and zeta potential – What they are and what they are not?
Bhattacharjee, S. (2016) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.017 · Cited by 4,702
Nanocelluloses: A New Family of Nature‐Based Materials
Klemm, D., Kramer, F., Moritz, S., Lindström, T., Ankerfors, M., Gray, D., & Dorris, A. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201001273 · Cited by 4,465
Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010
Faruk, O., Bledzki, A. K., Fink, H.-P., & Sain, M. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 · Cited by 4,262
Park, S., Baker, J. O., Himmel, M. E., Parilla, P. A., & Johnson, D. K. (2010) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/1754-6834-3-10 · Cited by 3,395
Nishiyama, Y., Langan, P., & Chanzy, H. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0257319 · Cited by 3,028
Chitin and chitosan polymers: Chemistry, solubility and fiber formation
Pillai, C. K. S., Paul, W., & Sharma, C. P. (2009) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.001 · Cited by 2,745
Cited by
Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials
Foster, E. J., Moon, R. J., Agarwal, U. P., Bortner, M. J., Bras, J., Camarero-Espinosa, S., Chan, K. J., Clift, M. J. D., Cranston, E. D., Eichhorn, S. J., et al. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00895j · Cited by 1,021
Self-citationDynamics of Cellulose Nanocrystal Alignment during 3D Printing
Hausmann, M. K., Rühs, P. A., Siqueira, G., Läuger, J., Libanori, R., Zimmermann, T., & Studart, A. R. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b02366 · Cited by 282
Production of Nanocellulose and Its Applications in Drug Delivery: A Critical Review
Salimi, S., Sotudeh-Gharebagh, R., Zarghami, R., Chan, S. Y., & Yuen, K. H. (2019) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02744 · Cited by 268
Wahbi, M., Wen, Y., Kontopoulou, M., & De France, K. J. (2025) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.124471 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Reid, M. S., Villalobos, M., & Cranston, E. D.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-12-13
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1583-1598
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2558058577
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 101
- FWCI
- 14.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benchmarking Cellulose Nanocrystals: From the Laboratory to Industrial Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765
- The paper
- Reid, M. S., Villalobos, M., & Cranston, E. D. (2017). Benchmarking Cellulose Nanocrystals: From the Laboratory to Industrial Production. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.