Cited by 47Magnesium Alloys: Properties and ApplicationsSurface Treatment and CoatingsBone Tissue Engineering Materials

Characterization and cytocompatibility of polydopamine on MAO‐HA coating supported on Mg‐Zn‐Ca alloy

Feng, Yashan, Ma, Xun, Chang, Lei, Zhu, Shijie, Guan, Shaokang·2017·Surface and Interface Analysis

Abstract

Magnesium has been suggested as a potential biodegradable metal for the usage as orthopaedic implants. However, high degradation rate in physiological environment remains the biggest challenge, impeding wide clinical application of magnesium‐based biomaterials. In order to reduce its degradation rate and improve the biocompatibility, micro‐arc oxidation coating doped with HA particles (MAO‐HA) was applied as the inner coating, and polydopamine (PDA) film was synthesized by dopamine self‐polymerization as the outer coating. The microstructure evolution of the coating was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscope (AFM), X‐ray diffraction analyses (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT‐IR), and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The results showed that PDA film had covered the entire surface of MAO‐HA coating and the pore size of MAO‐HA coating decreased. The root mean square (RMS) roughness of PDA/MAO‐HA coatings was approximately 106.46 nm, which was closer to the optimum surface roughness for cellular attachment as compared with MAO‐HA coatings. Contact angle measurement indicated that the surface wettability had been transformed from hydrophobic to hydrophilic due to the introduction of PDA. The PDA/MAO‐HA coatings exhibited better corrosion resistance in vitro, with the self‐corrosion potential increasing by 150 mV and the corrosion current density decreasing from 2.09 × 10 −5 A/cm 2 to 1.46 × 10 −6 A/cm 2 . In hydrogen…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sia.6286

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, Y., Ma, X., Chang, L., Zhu, S., & Guan, S.
Affiliations
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon (DE)
Corresponding author
Guan, Shaokang
Venue
Surface and Interface Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-14
Volume
49
Issue
11
Pages
1115-1123
ISSN
  • 0142-2421 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9918
OpenAlex
W2748923674
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Surface and Interface Analysis (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863) (2015AA033603, 2015AA020301)
  • the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC1102403)
  • Major Science and Technology Projects in Henan Province (141100310900)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Surface Treatment and Coatings
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Keywords
polydopamine coating, plasma electrolytic oxidation, hydroxyapatite, Mg-Zn-Ca alloy, corrosion resistance, surface roughness, wettability, cytocompatibility, MC3T3-E1 cells, coating microstructure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review