The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Separation of individual‐level and cluster‐level covariate effects in regression analysis of correlated data
Abstract
The focus of this paper is regression analysis of clustered data. Although the presence of intracluster correlation (the tendency for items within a cluster to respond alike) is typically viewed as an obstacle to good inference, the complex structure of clustered data offers significant analytic advantages over independent data. One key advantage is the ability to separate effects at the individual (or item‐specific) level and the group (or cluster‐specific) level. We review different approaches for the separation of individual‐level and cluster‐level effects on response, their appropriate interpretation and give recommendations for model fitting based on the intent of the data analyst. Unlike many earlier papers on this topic, we place particular emphasis on the interpretation of the cluster‐level covariate effect. The main ideas of the paper are highlighted in an analysis of the relationship between birth weight and IQ using sibling data from a large birth cohort study. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data
Bell, A., & Jones, K. (2015) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2014.7 · Cited by 1,515
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and 30-Day Rehospitalization: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Kind, A. J. H., Jencks, S., Brock, J., Yu, M., Bartels, C., Ehlenbach, W., Greenberg, C., & Smith, M. (2014) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m13-2946 · Cited by 1,379
Sibling Comparison Designs: Bias From Non-Shared Confounders and Measurement Error
Frisell, T., Öberg, S., Kuja-Halkola, R., & Sjölander, A. (2012) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e31825fa230 · Cited by 551
Causal Inference and Observational Research: The Utility of Twins
McGue, M., Osler, M., & Christensen, K. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610383511 · Cited by 529
Advances in Analysis of Longitudinal Data
Gibbons, R. D., Hedeker, D., & DuToit, S. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153550 · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- Begg, M. D., & Parides, M. K.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07-23
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2591-2602
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2002256171
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separation of individual‐level and cluster‐level covariate effects in regression analysis of correlated data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sim.1524
- The paper
- Begg, M. D., & Parides, M. K. (2003). Separation of individual‐level and cluster‐level covariate effects in regression analysis of correlated data. Statistics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1524
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.