Cited by 530Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsPhilosophy and History of Science

Causal Inference and Observational Research: The Utility of Twins

Open access
McGue, Matt, Osler, Merete, Christensen, Kaare·2010·Perspectives on Psychological Science

Abstract

Valid causal inference is central to progress in theoretical and applied psychology. Although the randomized experiment is widely considered the gold standard for determining whether a given exposure increases the likelihood of some specified outcome, experiments are not always feasible and in some cases can result in biased estimates of causal effects. Alternatively, standard observational approaches are limited by the possibility of confounding, reverse causation, and the nonrandom distribution of exposure (i.e., selection). We describe the counterfactual model of causation and apply it to the challenges of causal inference in observational research, with a particular focus on aging. We argue that the study of twin pairs discordant on exposure, and in particular discordant monozygotic twins, provides a useful analog to the idealized counterfactual design. A review of discordant-twin studies in aging reveals that they are consistent with, but do not unambiguously establish, a causal effect of lifestyle factors on important late-life outcomes. Nonetheless, the existing studies are few in number and have clear limitations that have not always been considered in interpreting their results. It is concluded that twin researchers could make greater use of the discordant-twin design as one approach to strengthen causal inferences in observational research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691610383511

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kaprio J Buchsbaum MS Gottesman II Heath AC Körner J Kringlen E Bouchard TJ Propping P 1993 Group report: What can twin studies contribute to the understanding of adult psychopathology? Twins as a tool of behavioral genetics 287 299 Chichester, England Wiley

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGue, M., Osler, M., & Christensen, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
McGue, Matt
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Published
2010-09
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
546-556
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
OpenAlex
W2024702358
Cited by
529
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 25
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA009367, R37AA009367)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG008761)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
causal inference, observational studies, discordant twins, monozygotic twins, aging, confounding, reverse causality, selection bias, lifestyle factors, causal effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review