Cited by 111Probability and Statistical ResearchStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods by Robert G. Newcombe,Statistics in Medicine 1998;17:857–872

Julious, Steven A.·2005·Statistics in Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.2164

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 6 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Newcombe, 1998, Statistics in Medicine, 17, 873, 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<873::aid-sim779>3.0.co;2-i · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Julious, S. A.
Affiliations
Northern General Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Julious, Steven A.
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005
Volume
24
Issue
21
Pages
3383-3384
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
OpenAlex
W2075023109
Cited by
111
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Statistics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
two-sided confidence intervals, confidence interval method, method comparison
MeSH terms
Humans, Statistics as Topic, Confidence Intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review