Cited by 63Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingInfection Control in HealthcareClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Automatic Digital Analysis of Chromogenic Media for Vancomycin-Resistant-Enterococcus Screens Using Copan WASPLab

Open access
Faron, Matthew L., Buchan, Blake W., Coon, Christopher, Liebregts, Theo, van Bree, Anita, Jansz, Arjan R., Soucy, Genevieve, Korver, John +1 more·2016·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are an important cause of health care-acquired infections (HAIs). Studies have shown that active surveillance of high-risk patients for VRE colonization can aid in reducing HAIs; however, these screens generate a significant cost to the laboratory and health care system. Digital imaging capable of differentiating negative and "nonnegative" chromogenic agar can reduce the labor cost of these screens and potentially improve patient care. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the WASPLab Chromogenic Detection Module (CDM) (Copan, Brescia, Italy) software to analyze VRE chromogenic agar and compared the results to technologist plate reading. Specimens collected at 3 laboratories were cultured using the WASPLab CDM and plated to each site's standard-of-care chromogenic media, which included Colorex VRE (BioMed Diagnostics, White City, OR) or Oxoid VRE (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom). Digital images were scored using the CDM software after 24 or 40 h of growth, and all manual reading was performed using digital images on a high-definition (HD) monitor. In total, 104,730 specimens were enrolled and automation agreed with manual analysis for 90.1% of all specimens tested, with sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 89.5%, respectively. Automation results were discordant for 10,348 specimens, and all discordant images were reviewed by a laboratory supervisor or director. After a second review, 499 specimens were identified as repre…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.01040-16

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior studies have shown the accuracy of these algorithms across multiple specimen types and media.

    “Prior studies have shown the accuracy of these algorithms across multiple specimen types and media (2–6).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faron, M. L., Buchan, B. W., Coon, C., Liebregts, T., van Bree, A., Jansz, A. R., Soucy, G., Korver, J., & Ledeboer, N. A.
Affiliations
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • PAMM (NL)
  • PAMM Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Veldhoven, Netherlands
  • CHU de Québec-Université Laval (CA)
  • Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program (CA)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2016-10
Volume
54
Issue
10
Pages
2464-2469
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W2460503493
Cited by
63
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
vancomycin-resistant enterococci, VRE screening, chromogenic agar, digital image analysis, active surveillance, health care-acquired infections, false-negative results
MeSH terms
Bacteriological Techniques, Chromogenic Compounds, Culture Media, Diagnostic Errors, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Mass Screening, Sensitivity and Specificity, Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections, Automation, Laboratory, Optical Imaging, Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review