The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis
Open accessAbstract
Trends in incidence or mortality rates over a specified time interval are usually described by the conventional annual per cent change (cAPC), under the assumption of a constant rate of change. When this assumption does not hold over the entire time interval, the trend may be characterized using the annual per cent changes from segmented analysis (sAPCs). This approach assumes that the change in rates is constant over each time partition defined by the transition points, but varies among different time partitions. Different groups (e.g. racial subgroups), however, may have different transition points and thus different time partitions over which they have constant rates of change, making comparison of sAPCs problematic across groups over a common time interval of interest (e.g. the past 10 years). We propose a new measure, the average annual per cent change (AAPC), which uses sAPCs to summarize and compare trends for a specific time period. The advantage of the proposed AAPC is that it takes into account the trend transitions, whereas cAPC does not and can lead to erroneous conclusions. In addition, when the trend is constant over the entire time interval of interest, the AAPC has the advantage of reducing to both cAPC and sAPC. Moreover, because the estimated AAPC is based on the segmented analysis over the entire data series, any selected subinterval within a single time partition will yield the same AAPC estimate—that is it will be equal to the estimated sAPC for that time partition. The cAPC, however, is re‐estimated using data only from that selected subinterval; thus, its estimate may be sensitive to the subinterval selected. The AAPC estimation has been incorporated into the segmented regression (free) software Joinpoint, which is used by many registries throughout the world for characterizing trends in cancer rates. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates
Kim, H.-J., Fay, M. P., Feuer, E. J., & Midthune, D. N. (2000) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<335::aid-sim336>3.0.co;2-z · Cited by 6,318
Self-citationCasella, G., & Berger, R. (2024) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003456285 · Cited by 5,711
Oehlert, G. W. (1992) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1992.10475842 · Cited by 1,379
- Statistical Models for Epidemiology
(2013) · Bayesian Methods in Epidemiology · doi:10.1201/b15382-9 · Cited by 1,346
Jemal, A., Clegg, L. X., Ward, E., Ries, L. A. G., Wu, X., Jamison, P. M., Wingo, P. A., Howe, H. L., Anderson, R. N., & Edwards, B. K. (2004) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.20288 · Cited by 1,140
Self-citationKim, H. (2001) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.811 · Cited by 873
Rosamond, W. D., Chambless, L. E., Folsom, A. R., Cooper, L. S., Conwill, D. E., Clegg, L., Wang, C.-H., & Heiss, G. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199809243391301 · Cited by 827
Self-citationFitting Segmented Regression Models by Grid Search
Lerman, P. M. (1980) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2346413 · Cited by 501
Howe, H. L., Wu, X., Ries, L. A. G., Cokkinides, V., Ahmed, F., Jemal, A., Miller, B., Williams, M., Ward, E., Wingo, P. A., et al. (2006) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.22193 · Cited by 427
Self-citationAngus, J. E. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484898 · Cited by 405
Cited by
Bladder Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Global Overview and Recent Trends
Antoni, S., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Znaor, A., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2017) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.010 · Cited by 2,514
Edwards, B. K., Ward, E., Kohler, B. A., Eheman, C., Zauber, A. G., Anderson, R. N., Jemal, A., Schymura, M. J., Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, I., Seeff, L. C., et al. (2010) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24760 · Cited by 2,002
Self-citationInternational Variation in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates
Center, M. M., Jemal, A., Lortet-Tieulent, J., Ward, E., Ferlay, J., Brawley, O., & Bray, F. (2012) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.054 · Cited by 1,521
Trends in Prescription Drug Use Among Adults in the United States From 1999-2012
Kantor, E. D., Rehm, C. D., Haas, J. S., Chan, A. T., & Giovannucci, E. L. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.13766 · Cited by 1,219
Kohler, B. A., Sherman, R. L., Howlader, N., Jemal, A., Ryerson, A. B., Henry, K. A., Boscoe, F. P., Cronin, K. A., Lake, A., Noone, A.-M., et al. (2015) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djv048 · Cited by 915
Metadata
- Authors
- Clegg, L. X., Hankey, B. F., Tiwari, R., Feuer, E. J., & Edwards, B. K.
- Venue
- Statistics in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-23
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 3670-3682
- ISSN
- 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0258
- OpenAlex
- W2172137144
- Cited by
- 1,256
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sim.3733
- The paper
- Clegg, L. X., Hankey, B. F., Tiwari, R., Feuer, E. J., & Edwards, B. K. (2009). Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis. Statistics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3733
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.