Cited by 16Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spline‐based self‐controlled case series method

Open access
Ghebremichael‐Weldeselassie, Yonas, Whitaker, Heather J., Farrington, C. Paddy·2017·Statistics in Medicine

Abstract

The self‐controlled case series (SCCS) method is an alternative to study designs such as cohort and case control methods and is used to investigate potential associations between the timing of vaccine or other drug exposures and adverse events. It requires information only on cases, individuals who have experienced the adverse event at least once, and automatically controls all fixed confounding variables that could modify the true association between exposure and adverse event. Time‐varying confounders such as age, on the other hand, are not automatically controlled and must be allowed for explicitly. The original SCCS method used step functions to represent risk periods (windows of exposed time) and age effects. Hence, exposure risk periods and/or age groups have to be prespecified a priori, but a poor choice of group boundaries may lead to biased estimates. In this paper, we propose a nonparametric SCCS method in which both age and exposure effects are represented by spline functions at the same time. To avoid a numerical integration of the product of these two spline functions in the likelihood function of the SCCS method, we defined the first, second, and third integrals of I‐splines based on the definition of integrals of M‐splines. Simulation studies showed that the new method performs well. This new method is applied to data on pediatric vaccines. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.7311

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.2307/2533328 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/sim.2302 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1017/S0950268811001531 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/sim.5949 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/bimj.201400257 · DOI
  6. 10.1214/ss/1177012761 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2006.00554.x · DOI
  8. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn013 · DOI
  9. 10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10108 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/biostatistics/3.3.433 · DOI
  11. 10.1137/0909024 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00887.x · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s10985-015-9352-x · DOI
  14. 10.1111/biom.12222 · DOI
  15. 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000001 · DOI
  16. de Boor C, 1995, A Practical Guide to Splines

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ghebremichael‐Weldeselassie, Y., Whitaker, H. J., & Farrington, C. P.
Affiliations
  • The Open University (GB)
  • School of Mathematics and Statistics The Open University Walton Hall Milton Keynes MK7 6AA U.K.
Corresponding author
Whitaker, Heather J.
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-03
Volume
36
Issue
19
Pages
3022-3038
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
OpenAlex
W2610304273
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Statistics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • MRC methodology (MR/L009005/1)
  • Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
self-controlled case series, splines, time-varying confounding, age effects, nonparametric estimation, pediatric vaccines, vaccine adverse events, likelihood function
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Bayes Theorem, Biometry, Computer Simulation, Humans, Regression Analysis, Vaccines, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Likelihood Functions, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review