Cited by 719Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Tutorial in biostatistics: the self‐controlled case series method

Open access
Whitaker, Heather J., Paddy Farrington, C., Spiessens, Bart, Musonda, Patrick·2006·Statistics in Medicine

Abstract

The self‐controlled case series method was developed to investigate associations between acute outcomes and transient exposures, using only data on cases, that is, on individuals who have experienced the outcome of interest. Inference is within individuals, and hence fixed covariates effects are implicitly controlled for within a proportional incidence framework. We describe the origins, assumptions, limitations, and uses of the method. The rationale for the model and the derivation of the likelihood are explained in detail using a worked example on vaccine safety. Code for fitting the model in the statistical package STATA is described. Two further vaccine safety data sets are used to illustrate a range of modelling issues and extensions of the basic model. Some brief pointers on the design of case series studies are provided. The data sets, STATA code, and further implementation details in SAS, GENSTAT and GLIM are available from an associated website. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sim.2302

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We defined a separate preexposure time window, during the control time, as the period of 30 days before treatment initiation and adjusted for it.

    “We defined a separate preexposure time window, during the control time, as the period of 30 days before treatment initiation and adjusted for it.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitaker, H. J., Paddy Farrington, C., Spiessens, B., & Musonda, P.
Affiliations
  • The Open University (GB)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) (BE)
Corresponding author
Whitaker, Heather J.
Venue
Statistics in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10-11
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
1768-1797
ISSN
  • 0277-6715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0258
OpenAlex
W2058837954
Cited by
719
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 42
FWCI
9.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Statistics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (070346, WT070346)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
self-controlled case series, acute outcomes, transient exposure, vaccine safety, Stata implementation
MeSH terms
Biometry, Child, Preschool, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Infant, Intussusception, Meningitis, Viral, Models, Biological, Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral, Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Risk, Vaccination, Models, Statistical, Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review