The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing
Abstract
This paper examines how existing knowledge base (i.e., knowledge breadth and depth) interacts with knowledge integration mechanisms (i.e., external market knowledge acquisition and internal knowledge sharing) to affect radical innovation. Survey data from high technology companies in China demonstrate that the effects of knowledge breadth and depth are contingent on market knowledge acquisition and knowledge sharing in opposite ways. In particular, a firm with a broad knowledge base is more likely to achieve radical innovation in the presence of internal knowledge sharing rather than market knowledge acquisition. In contrast, a firm with a deep knowledge base is more capable of developing radical innovation through market knowledge acquisition rather than internal knowledge sharing. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,654
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.6587995 · Cited by 10,758
(2003) · Cited by 9,368
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250141009 · Cited by 7,283
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Tsai, W. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069443 · Cited by 4,257
Cited by
Chuang, C.-H., Jackson, S. E., & Jiang, Y. (2016) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206313478189 · Cited by 423
Toward a better understanding of crowdfunding, openness and the consequences for innovation
Stanko, M. A., & Henard, D. H. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.003 · Cited by 312
Al-Husseini, S., El Beltagi, I., & Moizer, J. (2021) · International Journal of Leadership in Education · doi:10.1080/13603124.2019.1588381 · Cited by 296
Guillén, L., & Kunze, F. (2019) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21953 · Cited by 44
N. Lane, J., Friis, S., Cai, T., Menietti, M., Weber, G., & Guinan, E. (2024) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4769282 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1090-1102
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2048177814
- Cited by
- 1,122
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 102.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.1959
- The paper
- Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
