Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 516

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 164 of the 164 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strategy tools‐in‐use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice

Jarzabkowski, Paula, Kaplan, Sarah·2015·Strategic Management Journal

Abstract

In response to critiques of strategy tools as unhelpful or potentially dangerous for organizations, we suggest casting a sociological eye on how tools are actually mobilized by strategy makers. In conceptualizing strategy tools as tools‐in‐use, we offer a framework for examining the ways that the affordances of strategy tools and the agency of strategy makers interact to shape how and when tools are selected and applied. Further, rather than evaluating the correct or incorrect use of tools, we highlight the variety of outcomes that result, not just for organizations but also for the tools and the individuals who use them. We illustrate this framework with a vignette and propose an agenda and methodological approaches for further scholarship on the use of strategy tools . Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smj.2270

Cites

164 of 164 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 164 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00009 · DOI
  2. 10.2307/259329 · doi:10.2307/259329
  3. 10.2307/258597 · doi:10.2307/258597
  4. Brandenburger A, 1996, Co‐opetition
  5. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1697(199711)6:7<417::AID-JSC281>3.0.CO;2-9 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1697(199711)6:7<417::aid-jsc281>3.0.co;2-9
  6. Dougherty D, 1992, Symbols and Artifacts: Views of the Corporate Landscape, 185
  7. 10.5465/19416520.2013.769318 · doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.769318 · Paper page
  8. 10.2307/259268 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.5465/19416520.2012.656841 · doi:10.5465/19416520.2012.656841 · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199711)18:1 <583::AID-JOB908>3.0.CO;2-T · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199711)18:1
  11. 10.2307/258594 · doi:10.2307/258594
  12. Kaghan WN, 2005, Artifacts and Organizations, 259
  13. Kipping M, 1996, The US influence on the evolution of management consultancies in Britain, France, and Germany since 1945, Business and Economic History, 25, 112
  14. 10.1080/00076799900000322 · doi:10.1080/00076799900000322
  15. 10.1177/1056492604265348 · doi:10.1177/1056492604265348
  16. 10.1108/02756660810902297 · doi:10.1108/02756660810902297
  17. 10.1002/1099-1697(200009/10)9:6<379::AID-JSC493>3.0.CO;2-M · doi:10.1002/1099-1697(200009/10)9:6<379::aid-jsc493>3.0.co;2-m
  18. 10.1177/0021886310388162 · doi:10.1177/0021886310388162
  19. 10.5465/19416520.2013.781867 · doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.781867 · Paper page
  20. Orlikowski WJ, 2010, The Cambridge Handbook on Strategy as Practice, 22
  21. Orndoff K, 2002, Strategic tools for RIM professionals, Information Management Journal, 36, 65
  22. Pondy LR, 1983, Organizational Symbolism
  23. Remer S, 2001, Dealing with uncertainties in the biotechnology industry: the use of real options reasoning, Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 8, 95, 10.5912/jcb419 · doi:10.5912/jcb419
  24. 10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.109 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.2.109 · Paper page
  25. 10.1177/0170840605053813 · doi:10.1177/0170840605053813
  26. 10.1108/17410400510604539 · doi:10.1108/17410400510604539
  27. 10.1177/a028082 · doi:10.1177/a028082

Cited by

See all 516

Metadata

Authors
Jarzabkowski, P., & Kaplan, S.
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-08
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
537-558
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0266
OpenAlex
W2072818062
Cited by
516
References
164
FWCI
75.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • Advanced Institute of Management (RES-000-22-3134)
  • Economic and Social Research Council of the UK (RES-331-25-3013)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategy tools‐in‐use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.2270
The paper
Jarzabkowski, P., & Kaplan, S. (2015). Strategy tools‐in‐use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2270

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.