The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Formation of R&D consortia: industry and company effects
Abstract
This study investigates economic and strategic inducements of R&D cooperation. We focus on industry and company factors that affect a firm's rate of participation in R&D consortia. These factors are analyzed in a dynamic context using a sample of 312 Japanese firms in 74 industries between 1969 and 1992. We find a firm in an industry with weak competition and appropriability conditions has a higher rate of consortia participation. A firm's R&D capabilities, network formation through past consortia, encounter with other firms in product markets, age, and past participation in large‐scale consortia also positively affect its tendency of consortia formation. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.2.136 · Cited by 2,672 · cited 8×
“'' Our result is consistent with the observation that large firms contribute to innovation more in Japan than in the United States (Mansfield, 1988), because large firms tend to be more mature and it is easier for them to form an oligopolistic consensus among themselves. However, it should be also noted that Link and…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialRichardson, G. B. (1972) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230256 · Cited by 2,200
A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures
Hennart, J. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090406 · Cited by 1,843
Cited by
Orchestrating Innovation Networks
Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.21318923 · Cited by 1,803
Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem
Radziwon, A., & Bogers, M. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.021 · Cited by 382
The interplay of competition and cooperation
Hoffmann, W., Lavie, D., Reuer, J. J., & Shipilov, A. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2965 · Cited by 378
Renewing the resource‐based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods
Helfat, C. E., Kaul, A., Ketchen, D. J., Barney, J. B., Chatain, O., & Singh, H. (2023) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3500 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Sakakibara, M.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09-24
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1033-1050
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W1971720211
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formation of R&D consortia: industry and company effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.272
- The paper
- Sakakibara, M. (2002). Formation of R&D consortia: industry and company effects. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.272
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
